Compare Kobra vs Core A2V2
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Kobra |
Core A2V2 |
| Buy Filament forAnycubic Kobra | Buy Filament forGTMax Core A2V2 | |
| Estimated price | $259,00 | $684,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | GTMax |
| Release Year | 2022 | 2019 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 220x220x240 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 486x430x486 | 425x460x512 |
| Weight [kg] | 7 | |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | YES |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | |
| Filament End Sensor | NO | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Bowden |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 295 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 110 | 135 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 180 | 150 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,05 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Mono |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 400W | |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | SD / USB |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-09 | 2022-11-12 |
| Release date | 2022 | 2019 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Kobra features automatic bed leveling and a direct extruder for easy filament handling. The print bed is coated with PEI on a flexible steel plate, improving adhesion and making prints easier to remove. The printer features sensorless homing and is designed to be easily disassembled for easy maintenance and customization. | The GTMax3D ProCore A2v2 is a compact and robust 3D printer with a printing area of ??220 x 220 x 240 mm. It offers high print quality, ranging from 0.05 mm to 0.32 mm. Its features include automatic filament detection and changing, travel speed of up to 300 mm/s, and a heated aluminum bed with a glass top. It has automatic bed leveling with 16 points and an all-metal hotend that reaches up to 298°C. The printer has a carbon steel frame with electrostatic painting, is automatic bivolt and has connectivity via USB and SD card. The Bowden system and core xy kinematics complete its advanced features. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2.4 / 10 | 2.5 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Anycubic Kobra and the GTMax Core A2V2, several factors can help potential buyers decide which 3D printer best meets their needs and budget. The Anycubic Kobra stands out for its affordability, ease of use, and practical features such as automatic bed leveling and a lightweight design. Its maximum printing speed is higher, making it suitable for users prioritizing quicker print times. However, it lacks certain advanced features like filament detection, which may affect convenience during longer print jobs. On the other hand, the GTMax Core A2V2, despite its higher price, offers enhanced build quality and advanced features, including an enclosed design that can improve print consistency, particularly with temperature-sensitive materials. The all-metal hotend and superior maximum nozzle temperature also allow for a broader range of filament compatibility. Its automatic filament detection adds a layer of convenience, though its print speed is comparatively lower. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers hinges on budget and intended use. The Anycubic Kobra is a strong contender for hobbyists looking for value and user-friendly features, while the GTMax Core A2V2 may be more suitable for serious users seeking durability and precision in their prints, justifying its higher price tag. In the end, both printers have their unique strengths, catering to different user preferences and printing demands. |