Compare Kobra vs A1
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Kobra |
A1[BUY A1] |
| Buy Filament forAnycubic Kobra | Buy Filament forBambu Lab A1 | |
| Estimated price | $259,00 | $700,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | Bambu Lab |
| Release Year | 2022 | 2023 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 256x256x256 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 486x430x486 | 385x410x430 |
| Weight [kg] | 7 | 8,3 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | NO | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 300 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 110 | 100 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 180 | 500 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS | PLA, PETG, TPU, PVA |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker | SuperSlicer, PrusaSlicer, Cura, OrcaSlicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Touchscreen 3,5 |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 400W | 350 W |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | Wi-Fi, Bambu-Bus, Cartão Micro SD |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-09 | 2024-07-17 |
| Release date | 2022 | 2023 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Kobra features automatic bed leveling and a direct extruder for easy filament handling. The print bed is coated with PEI on a flexible steel plate, improving adhesion and making prints easier to remove. The printer features sensorless homing and is designed to be easily disassembled for easy maintenance and customization. | The BambuLab A1 printer features fully automatic calibration, multi-color printing with the AMS system, active flow rate compensation, quick nozzle change with a clip, active motor noise cancellation, a build volume of 256x256x256 mm³, a maximum extruder temperature of 300°C, and a heated bed of up to 100°C. In addition, it has high precision, a machine health management system and an intuitive 3.5-inch touchscreen interface. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | YES |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2.4 / 10 | 5.4 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| [BUY A1] |
Conclusion |
| In evaluating the Anycubic Kobra and the Bambu Lab A1 3D printers, there are key differentiators to consider that cater to different user needs and budgets. The Anycubic Kobra, with its lower price point, is a solid choice for budget-conscious users who seek essential features like automatic bed leveling and a reliable direct drive system. Its smaller print volume and moderate maximum printing speed may be limiting for advanced users, but it excels in providing good adhesion and easy maintenance. This model is ideal for hobbyists and beginners looking for a straightforward entry into 3D printing without a significant financial commitment. On the other hand, the Bambu Lab A1, priced higher, offers a more advanced suite of features tailored for serious users. With a larger print volume, higher maximum nozzle and bed temperatures, and impressive printing speeds, this printer is built for performance. Its support for multi-color printing and advanced features like active flow rate compensation elevate it above the Kobra, making it suitable for professionals or passionate tinkers who require robust capabilities and versatility. In summary, the Kobra delivers a solid cost-benefit for those who prioritize budget and straightforward functionality. In contrast, the Bambu Lab A1 justifies its higher price with superior performance and advanced features, appealing to enthusiasts and professionals ready to invest in more versatile, high-quality printing. Ultimately, the choice between these models hinges on the user's specific needs, experience level, and budget. |