Compare Kobra S1 Combo vs Ender 3 V3
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Model | Kobra S1 Combo[BUY Kobra S1 Combo] |
Ender 3 V3[BUY Ender 3 V3] |
Printing Material | Filament | Filament |
Buy Filament for Anycubic Kobra S1 Combo | Buy Filament forCreality Ender 3 V3 | |
Estimated price | $599,00 | $389,00 |
Manufacturer | Anycubic | Creality |
Release Year | 2025 | 2024 |
Print Volume [mm] | 250x250x250 | 220x220x250 |
Printer Size [mm] | 400x410x490 | 358x374x498 |
Weight [kg] | 18 | 7,12 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Enclosed printer | YES | NO |
Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
Bed type | Heated | Heated |
Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 320 | 300 |
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 120 | 110 |
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 600 | 600 |
Filament holder | YES | YES |
Camera for supervision | YES | YES |
Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, TPU[1], ABS, ASA | PLA, PETG e TPU (95A+) |
Recommended slicers | Anycubic Slicer Next, Orca Slicer | Creality Print, Cura 5.0 ou superior, Prusa Slicer e Simplify3D |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,01 |
Processor | 32 Bits | |
Display | Touchscreen 4,3'' | 4.3" HD touch screen |
Power Supply | 350 W | |
Connectivity | USB, Wifi | USB drive, LAN, Creality Cloud APP |
Operating systems | Windows, Linux e Macbook | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
Date of registration in the system | 2025-02-25 | 2024-03-01 |
Release date | 2025 | 2024 |
Extra features | The Anycubic Kobra S1 Combo is a fully enclosed CoreXY 3D printer with speeds up to 600mm/s and 20,000mm/s² acceleration. It features a 320°C hotend, native multicolor printing (4 to 8 colors with ACE Pro), and active filament drying. Equipped with LeviQ 3.0 auto-leveling, camera monitoring, AI failure detection, carbon filtration, and a 4.3 touchscreen, it ensures high-quality, efficient, and reliable 3D printing. | The Ender 3 V3 redefines 3D printing with its CoreXZ system, reaching speeds of up to 600mm/s, and stable metal construction with cast parts. It stands out for its powerful direct extrusion, quick-change tri-metal nozzle, and two powerful fans for instant cooling. Equipped with automatic calibration, it makes leveling and adjustments easy, promoting a fast and reliable printing experience with various materials. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | YES | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 8 / 10 | 3.6 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 5 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
[BUY Kobra S1 Combo] | [BUY Ender 3 V3] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Anycubic Kobra S1 Combo and the Creality Ender 3 V3, several critical factors emerge that may influence a buyer's decision based on their needs and budget. The **Kobra S1 Combo**, with its higher price point, offers premium features such as full enclosure, advanced cooling systems, and support for multicolor printing, making it suitable for more complex projects and materials. Its larger print volume and higher maximum nozzle temperature also contribute to its versatility and efficiency in handling a broader range of filaments, including specialty materials. Additional features like AI failure detection and camera monitoring further enhance its user experience. On the other hand, the **Ender 3 V3**, while more affordable, delivers reliable performance with a stable metal construction and a straightforward setup process. It focuses on fundamental features such as automatic calibration and effective cooling systems, which are beneficial for users seeking reliable prints without the need for extensive customizations. The Ender 3 V3 is an excellent choice for beginners or those looking for a cost-effective yet dependable 3D printing solution. Ultimately, the decision between the two printers should hinge on the user's specific requirements, such as the desired complexity of printing tasks, budget considerations, and the importance of features like enclosure and multicolor capabilities. Both models score similarly in terms of cost-benefit and performance, making either a solid choice depending on the user's priorities and the nature of their projects. |