Compare Kobra S1 Combo vs Core A2V2
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Kobra S1 Combo[BUY Kobra S1 Combo] |
Core A2V2 |
| Buy Filament forAnycubic Kobra S1 Combo | Buy Filament forGTMax Core A2V2 | |
| Estimated price | $599,00 | $684,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | GTMax |
| Release Year | 2025 | 2019 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 250x250x250 | 220x220x240 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 400x410x490 | 425x460x512 |
| Weight [kg] | 18 | |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | YES | YES |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Bowden |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 320 | 295 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 120 | 135 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 600 | 150 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | YES | YES |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, TPU[1], ABS, ASA | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS |
| Recommended slicers | Anycubic Slicer Next, Orca Slicer | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,05 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Touchscreen 4,3'' | Mono |
| Power Supply | ||
| Connectivity | USB, Wifi | SD / USB |
| Operating systems | Windows, Linux e Macbook | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2025-02-25 | 2022-11-12 |
| Release date | 2025 | 2019 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Kobra S1 Combo is a fully enclosed CoreXY 3D printer with speeds up to 600mm/s and 20,000mm/s² acceleration. It features a 320°C hotend, native multicolor printing (4 to 8 colors with ACE Pro), and active filament drying. Equipped with LeviQ 3.0 auto-leveling, camera monitoring, AI failure detection, carbon filtration, and a 4.3 touchscreen, it ensures high-quality, efficient, and reliable 3D printing. | The GTMax3D ProCore A2v2 is a compact and robust 3D printer with a printing area of ??220 x 220 x 240 mm. It offers high print quality, ranging from 0.05 mm to 0.32 mm. Its features include automatic filament detection and changing, travel speed of up to 300 mm/s, and a heated aluminum bed with a glass top. It has automatic bed leveling with 16 points and an all-metal hotend that reaches up to 298°C. The printer has a carbon steel frame with electrostatic painting, is automatic bivolt and has connectivity via USB and SD card. The Bowden system and core xy kinematics complete its advanced features. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | YES | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Hardware | 8 / 10 | 2.5 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 5 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
| [BUY Kobra S1 Combo] |
Conclusion |
| In conclusion, when comparing the Anycubic Kobra S1 Combo and the GTMax Core A2V2, several key factors stand out that can guide prospective buyers. The Kobra S1 Combo offers a more expansive print volume, which allows for larger projects and is designed for higher efficiency with a significantly faster maximum printing speed and improved performance in terms of acceleration. Its advanced features, including native multicolor printing capabilities and an AI failure detection system, clearly indicate a modern, versatile approach to 3D printing. Furthermore, it boasts a more user-friendly interface with a touchscreen, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced users. On the other hand, while the GTMax Core A2V2 is robust and reliable, it lags behind in terms of performance and print speed. However, its solid construction and features like automatic filament detection do provide value, especially for users who prioritize stability and print quality over sheer speed. While the Kobra S1 Combo is priced lower and provides a better cost-to-benefit ratio in terms of features and performance, the Core A2V2 might appeal to those who are looking for a more traditional and compact 3D printer. Ultimately, the choice between these two models should hinge on the user's specific needs for print size, speed, and overall functionality in relation to their budget. |