Compare Kobra 3 Max Combo vs Ender 3 PRO
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Model | Kobra 3 Max Combo |
Ender 3 PRO[BUY Ender 3 PRO] |
| Printing Material | Filament | Filament |
| Buy Filament for Anycubic Kobra 3 Max Combo | Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 3 PRO | |
| Estimated price | $699,00 | $258,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anycubic | Creality 3D |
| Release Year | 2025 | 2019 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 420x420x500 | 220x220x250 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 640x753x706 | 440x440x465 |
| Weight [kg] | 23,6 | 6,62 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Manual |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | NO |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Bowden |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 300 | 255 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 90 | 110 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 600 | 180 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | YES | YES |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, TPU | PLA, TPU, ABS, PETG |
| Recommended slicers | Anycubic Slicer, Cura, Orca Slicer | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
| Processor | 32 bits | |
| Display | Touchscreen 4,3'' | Mono |
| Power Supply | 800 W | 24V / 360W Meanwell |
| Connectivity | USB, Wifi | SD / USB |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2025-03-06 | 2021-04-14 |
| Release date | 2025 | 2019 |
| Extra features | The Anycubic Kobra 3 Max Combo combines high-speed and multicolor printing with up to 8 colors. It features automatic leveling, quick filament switching, clog and entanglement detection, and AI to prevent print failures. Its 800W hotbed heats up quickly, while 10,000mm/s² acceleration ensures efficiency. App and Wi-Fi control, print recovery, and video monitoring enhance the user experience. | The Ender 3 Pro stands out for its beginner-friendly assembly and easily modifiable structure. With a 350W power supply, it heats up quickly and has a simple application that offers good print quality. However, its motors and fans are noisy, and the interface seems outdated. Assembly is accessible, without the need for advanced techniques, and it has integrated belt tensioners. It includes a detailed guide and supports microSD card and USB. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | YES | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Hardware | 6 / 10 | 0.5 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 5 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
| [BUY Ender 3 PRO] |
Conclusion |
| In conclusion, the comparison between the Anycubic Kobra 3 Max Combo and the Creality 3D Ender 3 Pro reveals distinct advantages and trade-offs for potential buyers. The Kobra 3 Max Combo, being a newer model, offers advanced features such as faster printing speeds, automatic bed leveling, and enhanced monitoring capabilities. Its larger print volume and ability to support multi-color printing make it a compelling choice for users seeking versatility and efficiency in their 3D printing projects. However, it comes at a significantly higher price, which may not be justifiable for beginners or those with simpler printing needs. On the other hand, the Ender 3 Pro is more budget-friendly and is particularly appealing to novice users due to its straightforward assembly and modifiable design. Despite its older technology and some limitations in features—such as manual bed leveling and lower maximum printing speeds—it still delivers good print quality at a fraction of the cost of the Kobra 3 Max Combo. Ultimately, prospective buyers should consider their budget, printing requirements, and desired features when choosing between these two models. For those looking for high-performance capabilities and are willing to invest more, the Kobra 3 Max Combo is an excellent option, while the Ender 3 Pro remains a solid choice for those prioritizing affordability and user-friendliness. |