Compare Kobra 3 Combo vs Ender 3 S1 Plus

Comparison between the best 3D printers

Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.

Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.

3D Printer Kobra 3 Combo 3D Printer Ender 3 S1 Plus
Modelo

Kobra 3 Combo

 [BUY Kobra 3 Combo]

Ender 3 S1 Plus

 [BUY Ender 3 S1 Plus]
Buy Filament forAnycubic Kobra 3 Combo Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 3 S1 Plus
Estimated price $450,00 $549,00
Manufacturer Anycubic Creality 3D
Release Year 2024 2022
Print Volume [mm] 250x250x260 300x300x300
Printer Size [mm] 452x504x483 557x535x655
Weight [kg] 9,2 10,25
Power Loss Recovery YES YES
Enclosed printer NO NO
Bed Leveling Automatic Automatic
Filament End Sensor YES YES
Bed type Heated Heated
Power supply system Direct Drive Direct Drive
Standard nozzle 0,4 0,4
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] 300 260
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] 110 100
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] 600 150
Filament holder YES YES
Camera for supervision NO NO
Recommended filaments PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS, ASA, Nylon, PC, PP, HIPS PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS
Recommended slicers Anycubic Slicer, Cura, Orca Slicer Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker
Maximum Resolution [mm] 0,1 0,1
Processor 32 bits
Display Touchscreen 4,3'' Display touchscreen 4,3''
Power Supply 400 W 110/220V / 350W
Connectivity USB, Wi-Fi, Cloud SD / USB
Operating systems Windows, Linux, Macbook Windows, Mac, Linux
Date of registration in the system 2024-06-27 2022-11-04
Release date 2024 2022
Extra features The Anycubic Kobra 3 Combo offers advanced features, including multi-filament printing with the ACE (Anycubic Color Engine) system, allowing for quick switching of up to four filaments. It features automatic bed leveling, nozzle clogging detection, and integrated filament drying during printing. The printer supports technical materials such as ABS, ASA, Nylon, and PC, thanks to the hotend that reaches 300°C and the heated bed up to 110°C. In addition, it has a 4.3-inch touchscreen and compatibility with various slicers such as Anycubic Slicer, Cura, and Orca Slicer. The Ender 3 S1 Plus 3D Printer offers quality prints with a build volume of 300x300x300 mm. It stands out for its "Sprite" extruder, automatic bed leveling and easy-to-use touchscreen. It has excellent safety features and simple assembly. In addition, it features temperature uniformity in the heated bed, suitable for various materials.
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) YES NO

Notes *

Cost-benefit 8 / 10 6 / 10
Hardware 4.5 / 10 2.8 / 10
Tela . .
Print volume 4 / 10 4 / 10
Performance 5 / 10 1 / 10
 [BUY Kobra 3 Combo]  [BUY Ender 3 S1 Plus]

Conclusion

In comparing the Anycubic Kobra 3 Combo and the Creality 3D Ender 3 S1 Plus, it is clear that each printer excels in different areas, catering to diverse user needs and preferences.

The Kobra 3 Combo, released in 2024, stands out with its innovative features including multi-filament printing capabilities, a hotend that supports higher temperatures for advanced materials, and automatic bed leveling. Its maximum printing speed of 600 mm/s allows for faster production, making it an ideal choice for those who prioritize both versatility and speed. Furthermore, with a solid score in cost-benefit analysis and superior performance metrics, it provides excellent value, especially for users who may intend to experiment with a variety of filament types.

On the other hand, the Ender 3 S1 Plus, while slightly more expensive, offers a larger print volume and features aimed at user-friendliness and safety. Its robust build quality, effective temperature management, and easy assembly cater well to newcomers and those looking for a reliable everyday printer. However, it falls short in terms of performance and advanced features compared to the Kobra 3 Combo.

Overall, if you are seeking a printer that combines advanced capabilities and performance at an attractive price point, the Kobra 3 Combo is the preferable choice. Conversely, if larger print volume and user-friendly design are your priorities, the Ender 3 S1 Plus presents a solid, though less flexible, alternative. Ultimately, the decision will depend on specific printing needs and user experience preferences.