Compare KP3S PRO V2 vs Comgrow T500
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Model | KP3S PRO V2 |
Comgrow T500 |
Printing Material | Filament | Filament |
Buy Filament for Kingroon KP3S PRO V2 | Buy Filament forSovol Comgrow T500 | |
Estimated price | $229,00 | $799,00 |
Manufacturer | Kingroon | Sovol |
Release Year | 2024 | 2024 |
Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 500x500x500 |
Printer Size [mm] | 420x400x450 | 817x810x962 |
Weight [kg] | 12,6 | 39 |
Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
Filament End Sensor | NO | YES |
Bed type | Heated | Heated |
Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 300 |
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 80 |
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 350 | 500 |
Filament holder | YES | YES |
Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, TPU | PLA, PETG, Fibra de Carbono, TPU |
Recommended slicers | Cura, Orca Slicer | Creality Print, Cura 5.0 ou superior, Prusa Slicer, Orca |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
Processor | ||
Display | LCD Mono | 7'' IPS touchscreen, 60Hz |
Power Supply | 300 W | 500 W |
Connectivity | USB-C / MicroSD / Ethernet | |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | |
Date of registration in the system | 2025-03-18 | 2024-07-18 |
Release date | 2024 | 2024 |
Extra features | The Kingroon KP3S Pro V2 is a high-speed FDM 3D printer with Klipper firmware, ensuring fast and precise prints. It features linear rails on all axes, a Direct Drive extruder with a 9.5:1 gear ratio, and an efficient ceramic heater. It includes an inductive sensor for automatic bed leveling, a PEI magnetic bed, a built-in accelerometer for vibration calibration, and Wi-Fi, Ethernet, and USB connectivity for remote control. | The Sovol Comgrow T500 stands out for its large print volume of 500x500x500 mm, ideal for large-scale projects. It has a direct extruder with a gear ratio of 6.5:1, speeds of up to 200 mm/s, and high-performance motors. The 7" touchscreen with Klipper software makes navigation easy. The 49-point automatic leveling ensures a perfect first layer. It also has a full metal hotend at 300°C, linear rails on all axes, and WiFi connectivity. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 0.9 / 10 | 3.6 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
Performance | 3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Conclusion |
In comparing the KP3S PRO V2 by Kingroon and the Comgrow T500 by Sovol, several key factors emerge that will help users make an informed decision based on their specific needs. The KP3S PRO V2 is a more budget-friendly option with a compact print volume, suitable for hobbyists and smaller projects. It boasts a high printing speed and advanced features like automatic bed leveling and connectivity options, making it efficient for its price point. However, its limited print volume may restrict larger projects. On the other hand, the Comgrow T500 is designed for users looking to tackle larger prints, with a significantly larger build volume and enhanced durability due to its weight and robust materials. The T500 includes several advanced features, such as a touchscreen interface, efficient leveling, and a higher maximum nozzle temperature, which can be advantageous for more demanding printing tasks. However, this comes at a higher price point and increased physical size, which may not be suitable for everyone. Ultimately, the better choice between these two printers largely depends on the user's specific requirements. Those who prioritize cost, speed, and smaller projects may find the KP3S PRO V2 more appealing, while those requiring larger print capacity and additional features might lean towards the Comgrow T500 despite the higher investment. Both printers offer strong performance, but the best pick hinges on the balance between budget, scale, and desired features. |