Compare K1 vs Comgrow T500
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | K1[BUY K1] |
Comgrow T500 |
Buy Filament forCreality 3D K1 | Buy Filament forSovol Comgrow T500 | |
Estimated price | $399,00 | $799,00 |
Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Sovol |
Release Year | 2023 | 2024 |
Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 500x500x500 |
Printer Size [mm] | 355x355x480 | 817x810x962 |
Weight [kg] | 12,5 | 39 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Enclosed printer | YES | NO |
Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
Bed type | Heated | Heated |
Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 300 | 300 |
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 120 | 80 |
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 600 | 500 |
Filament holder | YES | YES |
Camera for supervision | YES | YES |
Recommended filaments | ABS, PLA, PETG, PET, TPU, PA, ABS, ASA, PC, PLA-CF, PA-CF, PET-CF | PLA, PETG, Fibra de Carbono, TPU |
Recommended slicers | Creality Print; Cura, Simplify3D e PrusaSlicer | Creality Print, Cura 5.0 ou superior, Prusa Slicer, Orca |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
Processor | ||
Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | 7'' IPS touchscreen, 60Hz |
Power Supply | 110/220V / 350W | 500 W |
Connectivity | Ethernet / USB / Wi-Fi | |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | |
Date of registration in the system | 2023-04-17 | 2024-07-18 |
Release date | 2023 | 2024 |
Extra features | The K1 is an extremely fast FDM 3D printer, reaching 600mm/s, 12 times faster than standard models. Equipped with a Core XY system and lightweight print head, it offers energy efficiency and high print quality. It stands out for its dual-gear extruder and quickly heated hotend, as well as dual cooling to prevent warping. Its robust structure ensures stability at high speed, with optimized software to speed up the printing process. | The Sovol Comgrow T500 stands out for its large print volume of 500x500x500 mm, ideal for large-scale projects. It has a direct extruder with a gear ratio of 6.5:1, speeds of up to 200 mm/s, and high-performance motors. The 7" touchscreen with Klipper software makes navigation easy. The 49-point automatic leveling ensures a perfect first layer. It also has a full metal hotend at 300°C, linear rails on all axes, and WiFi connectivity. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 5.4 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
Performance | 5 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
[BUY K1] |
Conclusion |
In conclusion, when comparing the Creality 3D K1 and the Sovol Comgrow T500, potential buyers must weigh their preferences regarding size, speed, and overall functionality against their budget considerations. The K1 is a cost-effective choice at a lower price point, offering impressive speed and efficiency, particularly for smaller projects. Its compact design and fast printing capabilities make it an excellent option for hobbyists and those with limited space. The inclusion of automatic bed leveling, a heated bed, and an enclosed design further enhance its usability and versatility, allowing for a variety of filament types. On the other hand, the Comgrow T500 appeals to users who prioritize print volume and are willing to invest more for larger-scale projects. Its substantial build space allows for ambitious creations, and features such as high-performance motors and a user-friendly touchscreen interface enhance the overall printing experience. Although it comes at a higher price, its performance and advanced features may justify the investment for professionals or dedicated makers. Ultimately, the best choice hinges on the specific needs of the user: if speed and compactness are key, the K1 stands out; for those needing larger print capabilities and are prepared to spend more, the Comgrow T500 would be the superior option. Both printers offer good value regarding their respective features, demonstrating that the decision should align with the user's printing goals and budget. |