Compare Halot One vs Kobra 3 Combo
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Halot One |
Kobra 3 Combo[BUY Kobra 3 Combo] |
| Buy Resin forCreality 3D Halot One | Buy Filament forAnycubic Kobra 3 Combo | |
| Estimated price | $250,00 | $450,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Anycubic |
| Release Year | 2021 | 2024 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 127x80x160 | 250x250x260 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 221x221x404 | 452x504x483 |
| Weight [kg] | 7,1 | 9,2 |
| Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 2k | 0,1 |
| Processor | 32 bits | |
| Display | Touchscreen 4,3'' | |
| Power Supply | 400 W | |
| Connectivity | USB, Wi-Fi, Cloud | |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-10-11 | 2024-06-27 |
| Release date | 2021 | 2024 |
| Extra features | Crealitys Halot-One printer stands out with several innovative features. It has a high-resolution touchscreen, providing an intuitive and responsive interface. Its quiet printing capability is remarkable, ideal for environments where noise is a concern. Assembly and setup are simple, with automatic functions facilitating quick start. Among its features, remote monitoring and adjustments via the Creality Cloud app stand out, simplifying remote print management. Replacing the FEP in the resin vat is easy, and the printer even includes extra FEP sheets. Top cover removal detection increases safety by automatically pausing printing. In addition, its integral light source promises high uniformity, optimizing print quality. | The Anycubic Kobra 3 Combo offers advanced features, including multi-filament printing with the ACE (Anycubic Color Engine) system, allowing for quick switching of up to four filaments. It features automatic bed leveling, nozzle clogging detection, and integrated filament drying during printing. The printer supports technical materials such as ABS, ASA, Nylon, and PC, thanks to the hotend that reaches 300°C and the heated bed up to 110°C. In addition, it has a 4.3-inch touchscreen and compatibility with various slicers such as Anycubic Slicer, Cura, and Orca Slicer. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | YES |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Hardware | 0.7 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Performance | 9 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| [BUY Kobra 3 Combo] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Creality 3D Halot One and the Anycubic Kobra 3 Combo, several key factors emerge that highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each 3D printer. The Halot One, priced more affordably, features a compact design with a maximum print volume of 127 x 80 x 160 mm, making it suitable for users seeking a budget-friendly resin printer with a high-resolution output. It boasts a user-friendly interface with a 4.3-inch touchscreen and includes several innovative features like automatic functions for easy setup, quiet operation, and remote monitoring via the Creality Cloud app. However, it lacks power loss recovery and multi-material support, which may limit its versatility for advanced users. Conversely, the Kobra 3 Combo presents a higher upfront investment but compensates with enhanced capabilities suitable for diverse projects. Its larger print volume of 250 x 250 x 260 mm and compatibility with a variety of technical materials such as ABS and Nylon cater to more complex printing needs. Features like automatic bed leveling, dual filament drying, and multi-filament printing with seamless switching enhance its user experience and functionality, supporting more complex projects. Notably, it also includes power loss recovery, a significant advantage for longer print jobs. Ultimately, the choice between the two printers hinges on user priorities: budget and ease of use favor the Halot One, while advanced features, versatility in materials, and larger print volumes tilt the scales towards the Kobra 3 Combo. Both printers have their merits; deciding factors will depend on the specific needs and expertise of the user. |