Compare Halot One Plus vs S7
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | Halot One Plus[BUY Halot One Plus] |
S7 |
Buy Resin forCreality 3D Halot One Plus | Buy Filament forUltimaker S7 | |
Estimated price | $399,00 | $8300,00 |
Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Ultimaker |
Release Year | 2022 | 2022 |
Print Volume [mm] | 102x172x160 | 240x330x300 |
Printer Size [mm] | 236x245x416 | 585x495x800 |
Weight [kg] | 6,8 | 29 |
Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | |
Processor | ||
Display | Display touchscreen 4,7'' | |
Power Supply | 500 W | |
Connectivity | USB / Wi-Fi | USB / Wi-Fi |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | |
Date of registration in the system | 2022-10-11 | 2023-01-28 |
Release date | 2022 | 2022 |
Extra features | Crealitys Halot-One Plus printer stands out for its 4K+ resolution that delivers sharp details and consistent surfaces. It features a fast and responsive 5-inch LCD interface, as well as easy-to-use Halot Box software. It offers Wi-Fi connectivity and remote print monitoring, as well as an integrated air filtration unit, a rare feature in this price range. The Halot-One Plus is designed for the prosumer market, combining high quality with advanced features such as Wi-Fi and air filtration. During testing, it stood out for implementing these features at an affordable cost, while maintaining functionality. It features an attractive design with a UV-resistant blue cover and a robust dual rail system for the Z-axis, ensuring smooth and consistent movements. The large LCD and high resolution of the LCD mask (4320 x 2560) are other strong points, allowing for fine details and textures in prints. | The UltiMaker S7 printer features a series of technological innovations to enhance 3D printing. It incorporates a flexible, magnetic build plate with PEI coating, promoting better adhesion and easier part removal. Its new inductive sensor significantly improves bed leveling, ensuring perpendicular and accurate prints. In addition, the S7 has a higher quality camera for remote monitoring, an integrated air filter, and uses a unique glass door to maintain a constant temperature in the print chamber. The machine is also compatible with the expansion kit for metal printing. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
Hardware | 1.6 / 10 | 4.8 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Performance | 9 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
[BUY Halot One Plus] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Halot One Plus and the Ultimaker S7, it becomes evident that both printers are designed for distinct market segments, appealing to different user needs and budgets. The Halot One Plus emerges as a highly cost-effective option, providing exceptional performance with a high resolution that caters well to prosumers. Its features, such as Wi-Fi connectivity, a responsive touchscreen, and integrated air filtration, offer considerable value for a more affordable price point. This printer shines particularly in areas of performance and cost-benefit, despite having a smaller print volume and less advanced hardware compared to its competitor. On the other hand, the Ultimaker S7 is positioned as a premium printer, boasting a larger print volume and robust build quality. It integrates advanced functionalities such as an improved bed leveling system, temperature control, and a higher-end camera for remote monitoring, which contribute to its suitability for professional applications. However, this comes at a significantly higher price, and its cost-benefit ratio suffers in comparison. Ultimately, the choice between the two should align with the user’s specific requirements. For those seeking an economical yet highly efficient 3D printing solution, the Halot One Plus stands out. Conversely, for users with more demanding needs in terms of build size and professional-grade features, the Ultimaker S7, despite its higher price, may be justifiable. Thus, the best choice will depend on the user’s priorities regarding budget, print volume, and additional functionalities. |