Compare Halot One Plus vs Photon M3 Max
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Halot One Plus[BUY Halot One Plus] |
Photon M3 Max |
| Buy Resin forCreality 3D Halot One Plus | Buy Resin forAnycubic Photon M3 Max | |
| Estimated price | $399,00 | $960,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Anycubic |
| Release Year | 2022 | 2022 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 102x172x160 | 298x164x300 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 236x245x416 | 400x408x596 |
| Weight [kg] | 6,8 | 21 |
| Power Loss Recovery | NO | NO |
| Technology | LCD | LCD |
| Screen Resolution | 7k | |
| Max Print Speed [s/layer] | 1 | 1 |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | |
| Power Supply | 150 W | |
| Connectivity | USB / Wi-Fi | USB / Wi-Fi |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-10-11 | 2023-01-19 |
| Release date | 2022 | 2022 |
| Extra features | Crealitys Halot-One Plus printer stands out for its 4K+ resolution that delivers sharp details and consistent surfaces. It features a fast and responsive 5-inch LCD interface, as well as easy-to-use Halot Box software. It offers Wi-Fi connectivity and remote print monitoring, as well as an integrated air filtration unit, a rare feature in this price range. The Halot-One Plus is designed for the prosumer market, combining high quality with advanced features such as Wi-Fi and air filtration. During testing, it stood out for implementing these features at an affordable cost, while maintaining functionality. It features an attractive design with a UV-resistant blue cover and a robust dual rail system for the Z-axis, ensuring smooth and consistent movements. The large LCD and high resolution of the LCD mask (4320 x 2560) are other strong points, allowing for fine details and textures in prints. | The Anycubic Photon M3 Max printer stands out for its large build volume of 298 x 164 x 300 mm, allowing the printing of large and detailed models. It has a 13.6-inch 7K monochrome screen, offering XY resolution of 46 microns, ensuring high-precision prints. It includes an innovative automatic resin refill system and a frosted glass-style FEP blade, improving part release. Its design includes a two-part acrylic cover, facilitating internal access, and a printing platform with aluminum side handles for easy handling. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 1.4 / 10 | 3.5 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 9 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
| [BUY Halot One Plus] |
Conclusion |
| In concluding the comparison between the Creality 3D Halot One Plus and the Anycubic Photon M3 Max, both printers present compelling features catering to different user needs and budgets. The Halot One Plus is positioned as a cost-effective solution aimed at prosumers, delivering impressive print quality with its 4K+ resolution, user-friendly interface, and useful features like Wi-Fi connectivity and air filtration at a fraction of the cost. Its lightweight design and compact size make it suitable for users with limited space while still allowing for high-quality prints. On the other hand, the Photon M3 Max excels in its larger build volume, enabling users to create larger and more complex models. Its advanced features, such as a 7K monochrome screen and automatic resin refill system, enhance user experience and efficiency, making it ideal for those who prioritize high precision and volume in their printing tasks. However, this comes at a higher price point and increased weight, which may be less appealing for casual hobbyists. Ultimately, the decision hinges on specific requirements: for users prioritizing affordability, ease of use, and solid performance for smaller prints, the Halot One Plus is an excellent choice. Meanwhile, those seeking larger print capabilities and advanced features may find the Photon M3 Max to be worth the investment. Balancing budget considerations with individual printing needs will lead to the best choice between these two capable 3D printers. |