Compare Halot One Plus vs Photo Mono 4 Ultra
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Modelo | Halot One Plus[BUY Halot One Plus] |
Photo Mono 4 Ultra[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Buy Resin forCreality 3D Halot One Plus | Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra | |
Estimated price | $399,00 | $250,00 |
Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Anycubic |
Release Year | 2022 | 2024 |
Print Volume [mm] | 102x172x160 | 153x87x165 |
Printer Size [mm] | 236x245x416 | 231x236x430 |
Weight [kg] | 6,8 | 5 |
Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
Technology | LCD | LCD |
Screen Resolution | 10k | |
Max Print Speed [s/layer] | 1 | 1 |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | |
Processor | ||
Display | Touchscreen 4.3'' | |
Power Supply | ||
Connectivity | USB / Wi-Fi | USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac | |
Date of registration in the system | 2022-10-11 | 2024-12-13 |
Release date | 2022 | 2024 |
Extra features | Crealitys Halot-One Plus printer stands out for its 4K+ resolution that delivers sharp details and consistent surfaces. It features a fast and responsive 5-inch LCD interface, as well as easy-to-use Halot Box software. It offers Wi-Fi connectivity and remote print monitoring, as well as an integrated air filtration unit, a rare feature in this price range. The Halot-One Plus is designed for the prosumer market, combining high quality with advanced features such as Wi-Fi and air filtration. During testing, it stood out for implementing these features at an affordable cost, while maintaining functionality. It features an attractive design with a UV-resistant blue cover and a robust dual rail system for the Z-axis, ensuring smooth and consistent movements. The large LCD and high resolution of the LCD mask (4320 x 2560) are other strong points, allowing for fine details and textures in prints. | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra features 10K resolution (9024x5120) with 17x17um pixels and high light uniformity (>=90%) enabled by the COB system with Fresnel lens and uniformity algorithm. It offers a build volume of 153.4x87x165 mm and speeds up to 120 mm/h with high-performance resin. It includes assisted leveling, built-in Wi-Fi, and a redesigned platform for better adhesion and easy model removal. Additionally, it has a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Hardware | 1.4 / 10 | 6.3 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 9 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
[BUY Halot One Plus] | [BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Conclusion |
In reviewing the Halot One Plus and the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra, both 3D printers have their distinct advantages that cater to different user needs. The Halot One Plus, priced higher, appeals to those seeking a well-rounded solution with advanced features such as a high-resolution display, Wi-Fi connectivity, and air filtration. Its robust build and larger print volume make it suitable for more complex projects, particularly for prosumers who value print quality and additional functionalities. With its notable resolution and responsive interface, the Halot One Plus stands out in terms of usability and performance. Conversely, the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra presents a compelling option for budget-conscious users. It offers impressive 10K resolution and features like print resumption after power outages, which enhances convenience and efficiency. The compact design and optimized print performance make it ideal for smaller projects or for users who prioritize speed without sacrificing quality. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers will depend on the user's specific needs. Those requiring more advanced features and larger print capacity may find value in the Halot One Plus, while those looking for a cost-effective, high-resolution printer may be more inclined to choose the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra. Both printers provide solid performance and quality, deserving consideration based on budget and intended use. |