Compare Halot One Plus vs Core One
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Halot One Plus[BUY Halot One Plus] |
Core One |
| Buy Resin forCreality 3D Halot One Plus | Buy Filament forPrusa Core One | |
| Estimated price | $399,00 | $1200,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Prusa |
| Release Year | 2022 | 2025 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 102x172x160 | 250x220x270 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 236x245x416 | 385x340x620 |
| Weight [kg] | 6,8 | 14 |
| Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | |
| Processor | xBuddy 32 bit | |
| Display | Touchscreen 3,5'' | |
| Power Supply | 240 W | |
| Connectivity | USB / Wi-Fi | SD |
| Operating systems | Windows, Linux e Macbook | |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-10-11 | 2024-11-27 |
| Release date | 2022 | 2025 |
| Extra features | Crealitys Halot-One Plus printer stands out for its 4K+ resolution that delivers sharp details and consistent surfaces. It features a fast and responsive 5-inch LCD interface, as well as easy-to-use Halot Box software. It offers Wi-Fi connectivity and remote print monitoring, as well as an integrated air filtration unit, a rare feature in this price range. The Halot-One Plus is designed for the prosumer market, combining high quality with advanced features such as Wi-Fi and air filtration. During testing, it stood out for implementing these features at an affordable cost, while maintaining functionality. It features an attractive design with a UV-resistant blue cover and a robust dual rail system for the Z-axis, ensuring smooth and consistent movements. The large LCD and high resolution of the LCD mask (4320 x 2560) are other strong points, allowing for fine details and textures in prints. | The Prusa Core One is a CoreXY 3D printer featuring a robust steel frame, a 3.5" touchscreen, and a heated chamber for technical filaments. It offers 360° cooling for improved print quality and supports upgrades from the MK4S model. With a compact design, a print volume of 270x250x220 mm, and compatibility with the MMU3 for multi-color printing, it stands out for its ease of maintenance, precision, and speeds up to 260% faster than the MK3S+. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | YES |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 1.4 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 9 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| [BUY Halot One Plus] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Creality 3D Halot One Plus and the Prusa Core One, prospective buyers must weigh several critical factors including functionality, print quality, and overall cost-effectiveness. The Halot One Plus is notably more accessible in terms of price, making it appealing for hobbyists and prosumers who seek high-quality prints without a substantial investment. It excels with its 4K+ resolution, user-friendly interface, Wi-Fi connectivity, and integrated air filtration, providing a good balance of performance and features for its cost. On the other hand, the Prusa Core One, while considerably more expensive, offers distinct advantages in terms of build quality and versatility. It features a robust steel frame, a heated chamber suitable for technical filaments, and compatibility with multi-material upgrades, making it ideal for users who prioritize durability and advanced capabilities. The Core One also offers faster print speeds and improved cooling, enhancing performance for more demanding projects. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers will depend on the user's specific needs and budget. For those seeking a solid entry-level option with great print quality and features at an affordable price, the Halot One Plus is an excellent choice. However, for professionals or serious enthusiasts who desire higher performance, durability, and additional printing capabilities, the investment in the Prusa Core One may be justified. In conclusion, both printers serve their target audiences well, but the decision hinges on balancing performance with budget considerations. |