Compare Halot One Plus vs CR M4
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Halot One Plus[BUY Halot One Plus] |
CR M4 |
| Buy Resin forCreality 3D Halot One Plus | Buy Filament forCreality 3D CR M4 | |
| Estimated price | $399,00 | $1099,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Creality 3D |
| Release Year | 2022 | 2023 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 102x172x160 | 450x450x470 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 236x245x416 | 655x700x865 |
| Weight [kg] | 6,8 | 23 |
| Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 800W | |
| Connectivity | USB / Wi-Fi | SD / USB / Wi-Fi |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-10-11 | 2023-02-06 |
| Release date | 2022 | 2023 |
| Extra features | Crealitys Halot-One Plus printer stands out for its 4K+ resolution that delivers sharp details and consistent surfaces. It features a fast and responsive 5-inch LCD interface, as well as easy-to-use Halot Box software. It offers Wi-Fi connectivity and remote print monitoring, as well as an integrated air filtration unit, a rare feature in this price range. The Halot-One Plus is designed for the prosumer market, combining high quality with advanced features such as Wi-Fi and air filtration. During testing, it stood out for implementing these features at an affordable cost, while maintaining functionality. It features an attractive design with a UV-resistant blue cover and a robust dual rail system for the Z-axis, ensuring smooth and consistent movements. The large LCD and high resolution of the LCD mask (4320 x 2560) are other strong points, allowing for fine details and textures in prints. | The Creality CR-M4 printer stands out for its easy assembly and automatic table leveling. With dual-gear extruder technology and direct drive, it ensures quality prints. It offers Wi-Fi and LAN connections for easy file sending. Its large construction volume of 450x450x470 mm allows for bold projects. It has linear rails and a high-power Y motor, supporting up to 30 kg on its plate. The innovative design includes an efficient cooling system and a removable screen controller, optimizing usability and comfort during printing. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Hardware | 1.6 / 10 | 3.6 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Performance | 9 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
| [BUY Halot One Plus] |
Conclusion |
| In concluding the comparison between the Halot One Plus and the CR M4 3D printers, we find distinct advantages and scopes that cater to different user needs. The Halot One Plus excels with its high 4K+ resolution, making it ideal for users who prioritize detail and surface quality. Its lower price point, combined with features such as a user-friendly touchscreen, Wi-Fi connectivity, and an integrated air filtration system, positions it as a remarkable option for prosumers and hobbyists alike. Conversely, the CR M4 stands out with its significantly larger print volume, appealing to those who seek to undertake larger projects. Its dual-gear extruder technology and automatic leveling ensure consistency and ease of use, making it a dependable choice for users focused on efficiency and advanced printing capabilities. However, it comes at a higher price and lacks some of the innovative features found in the Halot One Plus, potentially making it less attractive for budget-conscious buyers. Ultimately, if the priority is on affordability, high resolution, and advanced features for quality prints, the Halot One Plus emerges as the better choice in terms of cost-effectiveness and performance. On the other hand, for users whose primary concern is larger print capacity and reliable performance in a professional setting, the CR M4 may justify its higher price point. Thus, the selection between these two printers should hinge on individual needs—whether detail and budget efficiency take precedence or if large-volume capabilities are the desired focus. |