Compare Halot Mage vs Mega S
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Modelo | Halot Mage |
Mega S |
Buy Resin forCreality 3D Halot Mage | Buy Filament forAnycubic Mega S | |
Estimated price | $399,00 | $149,00 |
Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Anycubic |
Release Year | 2023 | 2019 |
Print Volume [mm] | 228x128x230 | 210x210x205 |
Printer Size [mm] | 333x270x608 | 405x410x452 |
Weight [kg] | 12 | 14,5 |
Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,1 |
Processor | 8 bits | |
Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Touchscreen TFT 2,8'' |
Power Supply | 100 W | 12V / 300W |
Connectivity | USB | SD / USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2023-05-23 | 2021-04-15 |
Release date | 2023 | 2019 |
Extra features | The Halot Mage stands out with its easy-to-operate, space-saving MageArch hinged lid that filters 99.89% of UV light. It includes an integrated air purifier with a large, efficient activated carbon filter that is ideal for absorbing resin odors. Its ultra-stable Z-axis with dual linear rails ensures larger, more accurate prints with minimal wobble. Plus, it features a robust tempered glass LCD protector for durability and protection against impacts and resin spills. | The Anycubic Mega S offers a printing platform with excellent adhesion, easy removal after cooling. It has a filament sensor for a better experience with flexible materials and a multilingual and intuitive color touchscreen. Assembly is quick, requiring only 8 screws and 3 connections. It has a large build volume (210 x 210 x 205 mm), high positioning accuracy and supports a variety of materials, including TPU, PLA, ABS and wood. It stands out for its solid metal structure, superior stability, high-quality printing with layer resolution of up to 50 microns, Ultrabase for easy adhesion and removal of parts, resumption of printing after power outage, high-quality extruder for flexible filaments, suspended filament support and stable structure that reduces shaking, improving printing quality. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
Hardware | 4 / 10 | 2 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 9 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Creality 3D Halot Mage and the Anycubic Mega S 3D printers, several key factors emerge that can guide potential buyers in making an informed decision. The Halot Mage, priced higher, offers advanced technology and features, such as an ultra-fine resolution, effective odor filtration, and an easy-to-use design, catering particularly well to those who prioritize quality in resin printing. Its robust construction and stability further enhance print accuracy and reliability. Moreover, the Halot Mage's modern design and innovative features reflect its recent release in 2023, making it a compelling option for serious hobbyists or professionals looking for cutting-edge performance. On the other hand, the Anycubic Mega S stands out as a more budget-friendly choice, emphasizing versatility and user-friendliness. Its assembly process is straightforward, and it supports a range of materials, making it an excellent entry-level option for newcomers to 3D printing. While it’s slightly older and may lack some of the high-end features found in the Halot Mage, it still delivers reliable performance and solid print quality at a more accessible price point. In summary, the choice between these two printers largely depends on the user's needs and budget. Those willing to invest in top-tier features and cutting-edge technology may find the Halot Mage worth the extra cost. However, for those seeking a straightforward, reliable 3D printer that offers versatility at a lower price, the Anycubic Mega S remains a strong competitor. Ultimately, both models cater to different audiences, ensuring that there is an option available for varying preferences and requirements within the 3D printing community. |