Compare FARM vs Adventurer 5M PRO

Comparison between the best 3D printers

Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.

Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.

3D Printer FARM 3D Printer Adventurer 5M PRO
Modelo

FARM

Adventurer 5M PRO

Buy Filament forSethi 3D FARM Buy Filament forFlashforge Adventurer 5M PRO
Estimated price $1127,00 $599,00
Manufacturer Sethi 3D Flashforge
Release Year 2021 2023
Print Volume [mm] 240x240x240 220x220x220
Printer Size [mm] 550x42x500 380x400x453
Weight [kg] 15,7 10,8
Power Loss Recovery YES YES
Enclosed printer YES YES
Bed Leveling Automatic Automatic
Filament End Sensor YES YES
Bed type Heated Heated
Power supply system Bowden Direct Drive
Standard nozzle 0,4 0,4
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] 270 280
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] 120 110
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] 80 600
Filament holder YES YES
Camera for supervision NO NO
Recommended filaments PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS PLA, PETG, TPU, PLA-CF, PETG-CF
Recommended slicers Cura, Simplify, Slic3r FlashPrint 5
Maximum Resolution [mm] 0,1
Processor
Display Touchscreen TFT Touchscreen 4,3''
Power Supply 450 W 350 W
Connectivity USB Wifi / Ethernet / USB
Operating systems Windows, Mac, Linux Windows, Linux, Macbook
Date of registration in the system 2022-10-11 2024-07-09
Release date 2021 2023
Extra features Sethi’s Farm printer offers a generous 240 x 240 x 240 mm print area, ideal for large projects. Its intuitive touchscreen display makes it easy to operate, while the intelligent sensor prevents problems by detecting filament shortages or jams. Its power recovery feature allows you to resume printing after interruptions. It stands out for its 9-point optical auto-leveling and high-performance heated bed, ensuring accuracy and versatility on different materials. Its 32-bit electronics and silent drivers promote a smooth and efficient experience. In addition, the Farm has a closed cabinet, expanding the range of usable polymers, and a turbo cooling system to speed up the process between prints. The machine also offers practicality with a storage drawer and simplified software updates. The Flashforge Adventurer 5M PRO features advanced features such as a CoreXY motion system, direct drive extruder, print speeds of up to 600mm/s and maximum acceleration of 20,000mm/s². It features fast nozzle changes, automatic calibration, active vibration compensation, camera monitoring, time-lapse video, HEPA and carbon filters for particles and VOCs, and an intuitive 4.3-inch touchscreen interface. Ideal for printing materials such as PLA, PETG, ABS and TPU.
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) NO NO

Notes *

Cost-benefit 6 / 10 7 / 10
Hardware 3 / 10 4 / 10
Tela . .
Print volume 3 / 10 3 / 10
Performance 0 / 10 5 / 10

Conclusion

In conclusion, the comparison between the Sethi 3D FARM and the Flashforge Adventurer 5M PRO highlights the distinct advantages and disadvantages of each printer, particularly in terms of features, performance, and value for money.

The Sethi 3D FARM, while offering a larger print volume and robust build quality, falls short in terms of performance, with a relatively lower maximum printing speed and less advanced features compared to its competitor. It does excel in versatility with its extensive material compatibility and user-friendly touchscreen interface, making it suitable for users who prioritize build size and material options.

On the other hand, the Flashforge Adventurer 5M PRO stands out as a high-performance machine, boasting rapid printing speeds and advanced features such as direct drive extrusion and active vibration compensation. Its lower price point and superior performance metrics suggest a better cost-benefit ratio, making it an attractive option for users seeking speed and efficiency in their printing projects.

While the Sethi 3D FARM may appeal to those focused on larger builds and material diversity, the Flashforge Adventurer 5M PRO represents a compelling choice for those looking for performance, advanced technology, and overall value. Ultimately, the decision between the two will depend on specific user needs, priorities, and budget considerations.