Compare Ender 7 vs Photo Mono 4
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Ender 7[BUY Ender 7] |
Photo Mono 4[BUY Photo Mono 4] |
| Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 7 | Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 | |
| Estimated price | $429,00 | $200,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Anycubic |
| Release Year | 2021 | 2024 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 250x250x300 | 153x87x165 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 430x460x570 | 300x300x480 |
| Weight [kg] | 17,2 | 4 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
| Processor | Creality CR-FDM V.2.4.S1_V101 32bits | |
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Touchscreen 2.8'' |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 350W | |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | USB |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-04 | 2024-12-13 |
| Release date | 2021 | 2024 |
| Extra features | Crealitys Ender 7 printer offers remarkable print speeds, utilizing CoreXY kinematics for precise and fast movement. With a 250x250x300mm build area, dual direct extruder, and custom hotend, the Ender 7 is capable of printing at high speeds, although quality may suffer on smaller prints. Assembly is relatively straightforward, but the machine is noisy and can get hot. Its true speed potential is most noticeable on larger prints, where it outperforms its competitors. | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 features 10K resolution (9024x5120), ensuring precise details with pixels of 17x17um. Its laser-engraved platform 2.0 offers excellent adhesion and easy model removal. Equipped with LighTurbo matrix lighting, it provides uniform illumination, reducing layer lines and rasterization. It has a print volume of 153.4x87x165 mm, 4-point manual leveling, and a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2.4 / 10 | 6.3 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 2 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
| [BUY Ender 7] | [BUY Photo Mono 4] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Creality Ender 7 and the Anycubic Photo Mono 4, several factors emerge that delineate the strengths and weaknesses of each printer, helping potential buyers make an informed decision based on their needs. The Creality Ender 7 is designed for those who require a larger print volume (250x250x300 mm) and prioritize speed, as it employs advanced CoreXY kinematics to achieve impressive print speeds. However, its larger size and weight may not be ideal for every workspace, and the assembly process, while straightforward, comes with some noise and heat concerns during operation. The Ender 7 is more suited for larger projects, though this may come at the expense of quality in smaller prints. Conversely, the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 excels in resolution, offering a maximum resolution of 0.01 mm, which is significantly higher than that of the Ender 7. This printer’s compact design and lightweight structure make it more user-friendly in tighter spaces, and the high-resolution capability ensures detailed prints, particularly suitable for small, intricate models. The advanced lighting and platform technology enhances print quality and efficiency, making it a great fit for detailed fine work. When considering cost-effectiveness, the Photo Mono 4 provides better overall value, particularly for users who prioritize high detail over print volume. The Ender 7, while more expensive, is geared towards those looking for speed and larger print capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between the Creality Ender 7 and Anycubic Photo Mono 4 hinges on the user’s particular needs: If large-scale printing at high speeds is paramount, the Ender 7 is the better option. For those seeking meticulous detail in smaller prints and a more compact design, the Photo Mono 4 stands out as the superior choice. |