Compare Ender 7 vs Photo Mono 4 Ultra
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Modelo | Ender 7[BUY Ender 7] |
Photo Mono 4 Ultra[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 7 | Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra | |
Estimated price | $429,00 | $250,00 |
Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Anycubic |
Release Year | 2021 | 2024 |
Print Volume [mm] | 250x250x300 | 153x87x165 |
Printer Size [mm] | 430x460x570 | 231x236x430 |
Weight [kg] | 17,2 | 5 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
Processor | Creality CR-FDM V.2.4.S1_V101 32bits | |
Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Touchscreen 4.3'' |
Power Supply | 110/220V / 350W | |
Connectivity | SD / USB | USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac |
Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-04 | 2024-12-13 |
Release date | 2021 | 2024 |
Extra features | Crealitys Ender 7 printer offers remarkable print speeds, utilizing CoreXY kinematics for precise and fast movement. With a 250x250x300mm build area, dual direct extruder, and custom hotend, the Ender 7 is capable of printing at high speeds, although quality may suffer on smaller prints. Assembly is relatively straightforward, but the machine is noisy and can get hot. Its true speed potential is most noticeable on larger prints, where it outperforms its competitors. | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra features 10K resolution (9024x5120) with 17x17um pixels and high light uniformity (>=90%) enabled by the COB system with Fresnel lens and uniformity algorithm. It offers a build volume of 153.4x87x165 mm and speeds up to 120 mm/h with high-performance resin. It includes assisted leveling, built-in Wi-Fi, and a redesigned platform for better adhesion and easy model removal. Additionally, it has a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Hardware | 2.4 / 10 | 6.3 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 2 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
[BUY Ender 7] | [BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Creality 3D Ender 7 and the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra 3D printers, several key factors emerge that will influence the choice for potential buyers. **Cost and Value**: The Ender 7 is positioned as the more expensive option, reflecting its larger print volume and versatile capabilities. However, the Photo Mono 4 Ultra delivers a highly competitive entry price while promising impressive resolution and advanced features. **Print Volume and Size**: The Ender 7 stands out with a significantly larger print volume, making it suitable for more extensive projects. Its considerable size may be advantageous for users focusing on larger prints. In contrast, the Photo Mono 4 Ultra is compact, catering to users who may prioritize space or primarily handle smaller projects. **Print Quality and Speed**: The Photo Mono 4 Ultra excels in print resolution due to its advanced technology, producing highly detailed prints. It also benefits from faster speeds, making it attractive for users who need both quality and efficiency. The Ender 7, while faster in large-scale printing, may not match the finer details provided by the Anycubic printer. **Features and Usability**: Both models include power loss recovery, ensuring that prints can be resumed after interruptions. The Anycubic model adds features like assisted leveling and built-in Wi-Fi for enhanced ease of use. While the Ender 7 is straightforward to assemble, it has been noted for its noise levels during operation, which may be a consideration for some users. **Overall Assessment**: If budget and resolution are top priorities along with compactness, the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra provides a strong cost-benefit ratio with its advanced features and print quality. Conversely, the Creality 3D Ender 7 might be the better choice for users who need a larger print volume and are focused on speed for bigger projects, accepting a trade-off on detail for scaled-up outputs. Ultimately, the best choice between these two printers will depend on the specific needs and preferences of the user—whether they value volume, detail, speed, or additional features. |