Compare Ender 7 vs Kobra 3 Max Combo
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Model | Ender 7[BUY Ender 7] |
Kobra 3 Max Combo |
Printing Material | Filament | Filament |
Buy Filament for Creality 3D Ender 7 | Buy Filament forAnycubic Kobra 3 Max Combo | |
Estimated price | $429,00 | $699,00 |
Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Anycubic |
Release Year | 2021 | 2025 |
Print Volume [mm] | 250x250x300 | 420x420x500 |
Printer Size [mm] | 430x460x570 | 640x753x706 |
Weight [kg] | 17,2 | 23,6 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
Bed Leveling | Manual | Automatic |
Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
Bed type | Heated | Heated |
Power supply system | Bowden | Bowden |
Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 300 |
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 90 |
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 250 | 600 |
Filament holder | YES | YES |
Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS | PLA, PETG, TPU |
Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker | Anycubic Slicer, Cura, Orca Slicer |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
Processor | Creality CR-FDM V.2.4.S1_V101 32bits | |
Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Touchscreen 4,3'' |
Power Supply | 110/220V / 350W | 800 W |
Connectivity | SD / USB | USB, Wifi |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-04 | 2025-03-06 |
Release date | 2021 | 2025 |
Extra features | Crealitys Ender 7 printer offers remarkable print speeds, utilizing CoreXY kinematics for precise and fast movement. With a 250x250x300mm build area, dual direct extruder, and custom hotend, the Ender 7 is capable of printing at high speeds, although quality may suffer on smaller prints. Assembly is relatively straightforward, but the machine is noisy and can get hot. Its true speed potential is most noticeable on larger prints, where it outperforms its competitors. | The Anycubic Kobra 3 Max Combo combines high-speed and multicolor printing with up to 8 colors. It features automatic leveling, quick filament switching, clog and entanglement detection, and AI to prevent print failures. Its 800W hotbed heats up quickly, while 10,000mm/s² acceleration ensures efficiency. App and Wi-Fi control, print recovery, and video monitoring enhance the user experience. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | YES |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 2.4 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 4 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Performance | 2 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
[BUY Ender 7] |
Conclusion |
In evaluating the Ender 7 and the Kobra 3 Max Combo, both printers present distinct advantages catering to different user needs. The Ender 7, priced lower, stands out due to its impressive print speeds, reaching up to 250 mm/s, making it suitable for users focused on efficiency in larger projects. It offers a straightforward assembly process, although it may be noisier during operation. Its print volume, while smaller than that of the Kobra 3, still allows for a range of common print sizes, and its cost-effectiveness is appealing to budget-conscious users. On the other hand, the Kobra 3 Max Combo, despite being more expensive, brings advanced features like automatic bed leveling, quick filament switching, and enhanced connectivity options like Wi-Fi, which enhances the overall user experience. Its larger print volume and support for multicolor printing with up to eight colors also position it as a better choice for those looking to explore more complex projects. Ultimately, the decision between the two depends on your specific needs: if you're looking for a faster, budget-friendly option with strong performance for larger prints, the Ender 7 may be ideal. Conversely, if advanced features, larger print capacity, and multicolor capabilities are more important, the Kobra 3 Max Combo is likely the better investment. Each printer holds its ground with a similar cost-benefit rating, making the final choice contingent upon personal priorities related to features and capabilities. |