Compare Ender 5 S1 vs Replicator Plus
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Ender 5 S1 |
Replicator Plus |
| Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 5 S1 | Buy Filament forMakerbot Replicator Plus | |
| Estimated price | $467,00 | $2099,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Makerbot |
| Release Year | 2022 | 2016 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x280 | 165x295x195 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 425x460x570 | 410x528x441 |
| Weight [kg] | 12,1 | 18,3 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Bowden |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 300 | 230 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 110 | |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 250 | 150 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU, PC, ASA, HIPS | PLA |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker | MakerBot Print Software |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,05 | 0,1 |
| Processor | 32 Bits | |
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3 '' | |
| Power Supply | 350 W | 110/220V / 240W |
| Connectivity | SD / USB / Wi-Fi | USB / Wi-Fi |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2023-10-04 | 2022-11-15 |
| Release date | 2022 | 2016 |
| Extra features | A steel drive shaft synchronizes the two Y-axis belts. High-torque 42-48 Y-axis motor for responsive and precise movement. Cartesian structure. Enhanced stability by thick linear shafts, extra stiffeners, two cantilevers, and silicone bumpers. Double Die Spring profile reinforcement. Silicone bed support. All-metal Sprite direct extruder. Best for printing with flexible filaments like TPU. Auto-calibration with 16-point CR Touch. Compatible with Sonic Pad, Wifi Box, and Camera kit. | The Replicator Plus printer is easy to use and has very good print quality. Its software is user-friendly and powerful, with USB, Ethernet, Wi-Fi and support for printing via pen drive. With a safe design for an open frame printer, it is relatively quiet. The Smart Extruder+ detects filament end and pauses printing automatically, in addition to notifying via apps. It has a large print volume, with a non-heated and coated print bed for easy removal of parts. It also has a webcam for remote monitoring of prints. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Hardware | 3.2 / 10 | 2.5 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 2 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Ender 5 S1 and the Replicator Plus, the Ender 5 S1 emerges as the superior 3D printer when considering both performance and cost efficiency. With a significantly lower price, it offers an impressive combination of features, including a larger maximum nozzle temperature, faster printing speeds, and a higher resolution capability. The Ender 5 S1 supports a wider range of filament types, which enhances its versatility for various projects, while also benefiting from modern design enhancements like an all-metal direct extruder and advanced stability features. Its automatic bed leveling and filament end sensor add to the ease of use, making it suitable for both beginners and experienced users alike. In contrast, while the Replicator Plus is known for its user-friendly software and reliable print quality, it falls short in terms of versatility and performance metrics. The higher price point does not translate into proportional advantages, particularly when considering specifications such as maximum printing speed and material compatibility. Ultimately, for those seeking a blend of value, functionality, and modern printing capabilities, the Ender 5 S1 stands out as the best choice, offering a more favorable cost-benefit ratio and superior hardware performance. |