Compare Ender 5 S1 vs A8 V2

Comparison between the best 3D printers

Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.

Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.

3D Printer Ender 5 S1 3D Printer A8 V2
Modelo

Ender 5 S1

A8 V2

Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 5 S1 Buy Filament forAnet A8 V2
Estimated price $467,00 $129,00
Manufacturer Creality 3D Anet
Release Year 2022 2021
Print Volume [mm] 220x220x280 220x220x250
Printer Size [mm] 425x460x570 428x441x486
Weight [kg] 12,1 6,2
Power Loss Recovery YES NO
Enclosed printer NO NO
Bed Leveling Automatic Manual
Filament End Sensor YES NO
Bed type Heated
Power supply system Direct Drive Bowden
Standard nozzle 0,4 0,4
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] 300 230
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] 110
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] 250 150
Filament holder YES YES
Camera for supervision NO NO
Recommended filaments PLA, ABS, PETG, TPU, PC, ASA, HIPS PLA
Recommended slicers Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker
Maximum Resolution [mm] 0,05 0,1
Processor 32 Bits
Display Display touchscreen 4,3 '' Display touchscreen 2,8''
Power Supply 350 W 110/220V / 250W
Connectivity SD / USB / Wi-Fi SD / USB
Operating systems Windows, Mac, Linux Windows, Mac, Linux
Date of registration in the system 2023-10-04 2022-11-10
Release date 2022 2021
Extra features A steel drive shaft synchronizes the two Y-axis belts. High-torque 42-48 Y-axis motor for responsive and precise movement. Cartesian structure. Enhanced stability by thick linear shafts, extra stiffeners, two cantilevers, and silicone bumpers. Double Die Spring profile reinforcement. Silicone bed support. All-metal Sprite direct extruder. Best for printing with flexible filaments like TPU. Auto-calibration with 16-point CR Touch. Compatible with Sonic Pad, Wifi Box, and Camera kit. The Anet A8 V2 is a Cartesian-XZ type 3D printer with a build volume of 220 x 220 x 250 mm, Ender 3 design and V-slot assembly. It has a 32-bit motherboard and touchscreen interface, promising ease of use. It uses open source firmware and has thermal failure protection. It stands out for its cable organization and the absence of a heated bed, focusing on energy savings and PLA printing. It comes with an external power adapter, aiming at greater safety, especially for beginners and educational use.
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) NO NO

Notes *

Cost-benefit 7 / 10 6 / 10
Hardware 3.2 / 10 0.7 / 10
Tela . .
Print volume 3 / 10 3 / 10
Performance 2 / 10 1 / 10

Conclusion

In comparing the Ender 5 S1 and the Anet A8 V2, it is evident that both 3D printers cater to different user needs and preferences, reflecting their respective price points.

The Ender 5 S1, while more expensive, offers a range of advanced features, including automatic bed leveling, a heated bed, and a robust build volume. It supports a wider variety of materials and has a higher maximum nozzle temperature, making it suitable for more complex printing tasks. Additionally, its power loss recovery and filament end sensor are invaluable for uninterrupted printing, which is particularly useful for users engaged in longer projects. The modern touchscreen display and superior print speed enhance the overall user experience, especially for those looking for efficiency and precision.

On the other hand, the Anet A8 V2 is positioned as a budget-friendly option that caters to beginners or educational settings. While it has a simpler design and manual bed leveling, it still manages to deliver commendable results for basic PLA printing. Its lightweight structure and straightforward assembly process contribute to its appeal for those new to 3D printing. However, it lacks advanced features like automatic recovery and a heated bed, which may limit its capabilities and versatility.

Ultimately, if advanced functionality, efficiency, and flexibility in materials are priorities, the Ender 5 S1 is the better investment. Conversely, for budget-conscious users or those just entering the 3D printing space, the Anet A8 V2 offers a practical solution without compromising too much on usability. The choice between the two ultimately depends on the user's specific needs and experience level in 3D printing.