Compare Ender 5 Plus vs A8 V2
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | Ender 5 Plus[BUY Ender 5 Plus] |
A8 V2 |
Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 5 Plus | Buy Filament forAnet A8 V2 | |
Estimated price | $599,00 | $129,00 |
Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Anet |
Release Year | 2019 | 2021 |
Print Volume [mm] | 350x350x400 | 220x220x250 |
Printer Size [mm] | 632x619x666 | 428x441x486 |
Weight [kg] | 18,2 | 6,2 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
Bed Leveling | Automatic | Manual |
Filament End Sensor | YES | NO |
Bed type | Heated | |
Power supply system | Bowden | Bowden |
Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 230 |
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | |
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 180 | 150 |
Filament holder | YES | YES |
Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
Recommended filaments | PLA, TPU, ABS, PETG | PLA |
Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
Processor | 32 bits | |
Display | Touchscreen TFT 4,3'' | Display touchscreen 2,8'' |
Power Supply | 24V / 504W | 110/220V / 250W |
Connectivity | SD / USB | SD / USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2021-04-14 | 2022-11-10 |
Release date | 2019 | 2021 |
Extra features | The Ender 5 Plus offers a large print volume (350x350x400 mm) and fast assembly. It includes a BLTouch sensor, but with range limitations. It stands out for its dimensional accuracy, although it requires adjustments to the slicer settings. Despite the noise, its integrated design saves space, and includes features such as a filament sensor and power resumption. Ideal for large projects, it requires refinement in the settings for high-quality prints. | The Anet A8 V2 is a Cartesian-XZ type 3D printer with a build volume of 220 x 220 x 250 mm, Ender 3 design and V-slot assembly. It has a 32-bit motherboard and touchscreen interface, promising ease of use. It uses open source firmware and has thermal failure protection. It stands out for its cable organization and the absence of a heated bed, focusing on energy savings and PLA printing. It comes with an external power adapter, aiming at greater safety, especially for beginners and educational use. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
Hardware | 2 / 10 | 0.7 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 1 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
[BUY Ender 5 Plus] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Ender 5 Plus and the A8 V2, it is clear that both printers cater to different user needs and budget considerations. The Ender 5 Plus, while significantly more expensive, offers a much larger print volume, advanced features such as power loss recovery, an automatic bed leveling system, and a filament sensor. These functions greatly enhance its versatility for larger projects and improve user experience, especially for those aiming for high-quality prints across various materials. Its maximum nozzle and bed temperatures also accommodate a wider range of filament options, making it a more flexible choice for experienced users. Conversely, the A8 V2 stands out as a budget-friendly option, suitable for beginners or those primarily interested in printing basic models with PLA. Despite its limited features and smaller print volume, it offers an accessible entry point into 3D printing with its compact design and ease of use. Its lower cost and relatively lightweight make it a practical choice for educational environments or hobbyists looking to start without a significant financial commitment. Ultimately, the choice between the two printers should be guided by the intended use and budget. Those seeking a robust and versatile 3D printing experience may find the Ender 5 Plus worth the investment, while beginners or casual users might prefer the A8 V2 for its affordability and simplicity. |