Compare Ender 3 vs Photon
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | Ender 3[BUY Ender 3] |
Photon |
Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 3 | Buy Resin forAnycubic Photon | |
Estimated price | $210,00 | $100,00 |
Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Anycubic |
Release Year | 2018 | 2019 |
Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 65x115x155 |
Printer Size [mm] | 440x440x465 | 220x200x400 |
Weight [kg] | 6,62 | 7,2 |
Power Loss Recovery | NO | NO |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | |
Processor | 8 bits | |
Display | Mono | Touchscreen TFT 3,5'' |
Power Supply | 24V / 270W | 40W |
Connectivity | SD / USB | USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2021-04-13 | 2021-04-15 |
Release date | 2018 | 2019 |
Extra features | The Ender 3 V1 is a DIY assembly 3D printer, a sales leader since 2017, standing out for its cost-benefit. With a wide printing capacity, it has a CNC machined structure for precision and stability. It offers high-precision prints with low noise, thanks to its innovative V-profile and pulleys. It has a self-adhesive magnetic platform for easy removal of models and excellent adhesion. The Ender 3 heats up quickly, reaching 100°C in 5 minutes, ideal for agile prints. It includes protection against power failures, allowing you to resume printing after interruptions, saving time and material. | The Anycubic Photon DLP is a resin 3D printer that stands out for its affordability and quality. It uses DLP (Digital Light Processing) technology to cure resin layers with precision, offering resolution of 25-100 microns. Its build volume is 115 x 65 x 155 mm, suitable for modest-sized projects. It includes a 2.8-inch touchscreen, USB and SD card connectivity, and a carbon filter to mitigate odors. It is notable for generating efficient support structures through its custom slicing software. Although it requires care in resin handling and post-processing, it is an excellent option for beginners and professionals who want to explore resin 3D printing with high resolution and ease of use. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
Hardware | 0.5 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 1 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
[BUY Ender 3] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Creality 3D Ender 3 and the Anycubic Photon, both 3D printers cater to different user needs and printing applications, making the choice largely dependent on specific priorities. The Ender 3, with its larger print volume, offers considerable flexibility for various projects, making it a strong contender for those looking to print larger models or multiple parts simultaneously. Its cost-effective nature, along with features like a self-adhesive magnetic platform and a robust construction, provide users with a reliable and efficient printing experience. The printer's ability to recover from power loss adds an additional layer of convenience for those engaged in longer print jobs. On the other hand, the Photon excels in delivering high-resolution prints, making it a suitable choice for detailed projects such as miniatures or intricate designs. Its DLP technology allows for finer layer resolution, appealing to users interested in precision resin printing. However, the smaller build volume can limit creativity for users wishing to produce larger objects. In terms of ease of use, both printers support multiple operating systems, but the Photon includes a touchscreen that enhances user interaction. The Ender 3's DIY assembly approach may be daunting for some beginners but offers a satisfying hands-on experience for those inclined towards assembly and customization. Ultimately, for those prioritizing larger print volumes and versatility at a better cost-benefit ratio, the Ender 3 stands out as the preferable option. In contrast, if high resolution and detail in smaller prints are a primary concern, the Anycubic Photon may be the better choice despite its smaller build capacity. Users should consider their specific printing needs and preferences carefully to make an informed decision between these two capable printers. |