Compare Ender 3 vs Photo Mono 4
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Modelo | Ender 3[BUY Ender 3] |
Photo Mono 4[BUY Photo Mono 4] |
Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 3 | Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 | |
Estimated price | $210,00 | $200,00 |
Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Anycubic |
Release Year | 2018 | 2024 |
Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 153x87x165 |
Printer Size [mm] | 440x440x465 | 300x300x480 |
Weight [kg] | 6,62 | 4 |
Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
Processor | 8 bits | |
Display | Mono | Touchscreen 2.8'' |
Power Supply | 24V / 270W | |
Connectivity | SD / USB | USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac |
Date of registration in the system | 2021-04-13 | 2024-12-13 |
Release date | 2018 | 2024 |
Extra features | The Ender 3 V1 is a DIY assembly 3D printer, a sales leader since 2017, standing out for its cost-benefit. With a wide printing capacity, it has a CNC machined structure for precision and stability. It offers high-precision prints with low noise, thanks to its innovative V-profile and pulleys. It has a self-adhesive magnetic platform for easy removal of models and excellent adhesion. The Ender 3 heats up quickly, reaching 100°C in 5 minutes, ideal for agile prints. It includes protection against power failures, allowing you to resume printing after interruptions, saving time and material. | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 features 10K resolution (9024x5120), ensuring precise details with pixels of 17x17um. Its laser-engraved platform 2.0 offers excellent adhesion and easy model removal. Equipped with LighTurbo matrix lighting, it provides uniform illumination, reducing layer lines and rasterization. It has a print volume of 153.4x87x165 mm, 4-point manual leveling, and a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Hardware | 0.5 / 10 | 6.3 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 1 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
[BUY Ender 3] | [BUY Photo Mono 4] |
Conclusion |
In conclusion, the comparison between the Ender 3 and the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 highlights distinct strengths and weaknesses, making each printer suitable for different user needs. The Ender 3, with its larger print volume and established reputation, offers significant versatility for users focused on larger projects and DIY assembly. Its cost-effective nature and robust community support further enhance its appeal, despite a lack of advanced features like power loss recovery. On the other hand, the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 shines in precision and print quality, boasting a higher maximum resolution that makes it ideal for detailed work. Its modern features, including a touchscreen interface and power recovery function, cater to users seeking ease of use and reliability in print consistency. However, it compromises on build size, which might be a limiting factor for some applications. Ultimately, the decision between the two will depend on the user’s priorities: those looking for value and larger print capabilities may lean towards the Ender 3, while individuals seeking superior detail and modern conveniences might find the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 to be the better choice. |