Compare Ender 3 vs M5
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | Ender 3[BUY Ender 3] |
M5 |
Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 3 | Buy Filament forAnkerMake M5 | |
Estimated price | $210,00 | $497,00 |
Manufacturer | Creality 3D | AnkerMake |
Release Year | 2018 | 2023 |
Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 235x235x250 |
Printer Size [mm] | 440x440x465 | 502x438x470 |
Weight [kg] | 6,62 | 12,6 |
Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
Bed Leveling | Manual | Automatic |
Filament End Sensor | NO | YES |
Bed type | Heated | Heated |
Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 255 | 260 |
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 110 | 100 |
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 180 | 500 |
Filament holder | YES | YES |
Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
Recommended filaments | PLA, TPU, ABS, PETG | PLA, PETG, ABS |
Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r | AnkerMake Studio (macOS, Windows), Simplify3D, Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
Processor | 8 bits | |
Display | Mono | Touchscreen 4,3'' |
Power Supply | 24V / 270W | 350 W |
Connectivity | SD / USB | Wi-Fi, USB-C, OTA Upgrade |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
Date of registration in the system | 2021-04-13 | 2024-07-08 |
Release date | 2018 | 2023 |
Extra features | The Ender 3 V1 is a DIY assembly 3D printer, a sales leader since 2017, standing out for its cost-benefit. With a wide printing capacity, it has a CNC machined structure for precision and stability. It offers high-precision prints with low noise, thanks to its innovative V-profile and pulleys. It has a self-adhesive magnetic platform for easy removal of models and excellent adhesion. The Ender 3 heats up quickly, reaching 100°C in 5 minutes, ideal for agile prints. It includes protection against power failures, allowing you to resume printing after interruptions, saving time and material. | The AnkerMake M5 printer stands out for its impressive print speed, reaching up to 500mm/s. It features AI print monitoring, an integrated camera for creating timelapses, auto-leveling bed with pressure sensor, direct extruder, flexible PEI-coated build plate, and Wi-Fi and USB-C connectivity. Assembly is quick and easy, and the printer is designed to deliver high print quality and ease of use. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Hardware | 0.5 / 10 | 4.5 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 2 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
[BUY Ender 3] |
Conclusion |
In conclusion, when comparing the Ender 3 and the AnkerMake M5 3D printers, several key factors emerge that highlight their respective strengths and weaknesses. The **Ender 3**, released in 2018, is a budget-friendly option that has proven to be a popular choice due to its cost-effectiveness and strong community support. It offers a solid print volume and has a reputation for reliability and quality in the prints it produces. However, it operates with manual bed leveling, lacks additional features like power loss recovery, and has a relatively lower maximum printing speed. On the other hand, the **AnkerMake M5**, launched in 2023, is positioned as a higher-end model that caters to users looking for advanced features and enhanced performance. Its automatic bed leveling, fast printing speed, and robust connectivity options, including Wi-Fi and USB-C, make it an attractive choice for those prioritizing convenience and efficiency. Additionally, its advanced print monitoring and quicker assembly contribute to a more user-friendly experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on the user’s budget and specific requirements. The Ender 3 is ideal for hobbyists or beginners looking for an affordable yet reliable printer, while the AnkerMake M5 is better suited for those willing to invest more for advanced functionality and higher productivity. Considering these aspects, it is clear that both printers have their unique appeal but cater to different segments of the 3D printing market. |