Compare Ender 3 V3 vs Core One
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Ender 3 V3[BUY Ender 3 V3] |
Core One |
| Buy Filament forCreality Ender 3 V3 | Buy Filament forPrusa Core One | |
| Estimated price | $389,00 | $1200,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality | Prusa |
| Release Year | 2024 | 2025 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 250x220x270 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 358x374x498 | 385x340x620 |
| Weight [kg] | 7,12 | 14 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | YES |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 300 | 300 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 110 | 120 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 600 | 500 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG e TPU (95A+) | PLA, TPU, TPE, HIPS, ABS, PETG, WOOD, PC, PA, PVA, ASA |
| Recommended slicers | Creality Print, Cura 5.0 ou superior, Prusa Slicer e Simplify3D | Cura, Prusa Slicer, Orca |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,01 | 0,01 |
| Processor | 32 Bits | xBuddy 32 bit |
| Display | 4.3" HD touch screen | Touchscreen 3,5'' |
| Power Supply | 350 W | 240 W |
| Connectivity | USB drive, LAN, Creality Cloud APP | SD |
| Operating systems | Windows, Linux, Macbook | Windows, Linux e Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-03-01 | 2024-11-27 |
| Release date | 2024 | 2025 |
| Extra features | The Ender 3 V3 redefines 3D printing with its CoreXZ system, reaching speeds of up to 600mm/s, and stable metal construction with cast parts. It stands out for its powerful direct extrusion, quick-change tri-metal nozzle, and two powerful fans for instant cooling. Equipped with automatic calibration, it makes leveling and adjustments easy, promoting a fast and reliable printing experience with various materials. | The Prusa Core One is a CoreXY 3D printer featuring a robust steel frame, a 3.5" touchscreen, and a heated chamber for technical filaments. It offers 360° cooling for improved print quality and supports upgrades from the MK4S model. With a compact design, a print volume of 270x250x220 mm, and compatibility with the MMU3 for multi-color printing, it stands out for its ease of maintenance, precision, and speeds up to 260% faster than the MK3S+. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | YES |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 3.6 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 5 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| [BUY Ender 3 V3] |
Conclusion |
| In conclusion, the comparison between the Ender 3 V3 and the Prusa Core One reveals distinct advantages and disadvantages for each 3D printer, ultimately catering to different user needs and budgets. The Ender 3 V3 offers an affordable price point, making it an attractive option for hobbyists and those new to 3D printing. Its impressive maximum printing speed and robust features, such as automatic bed leveling and power loss recovery, enhance usability and convenience. However, it lacks an enclosed build, which may limit its capability with certain materials and reduce environmental control during printing. In contrast, the Prusa Core One, while significantly more expensive, brings a number of advanced features suitable for more experienced users or those seeking professional-grade results. Its enclosed design enables better temperature management, which is essential for printing with a wider variety of filaments. The support for multi-color printing adds flexibility for more complex projects, along with a solid, durable frame that ensures longevity. Ultimately, users should consider their specific printing needs, budget, and experience level when choosing between these two models. The Ender 3 V3 excels in affordability and speed, while the Prusa Core One delivers superior versatility and performance for higher-end applications, thus making the decision dependent on the individual's priorities in their 3D printing journey. |