Compare Ender 3 V3 SE vs Replicator Plus
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Ender 3 V3 SE[BUY Ender 3 V3 SE] |
Replicator Plus |
| Buy Filament forCreality Ender 3 V3 SE | Buy Filament forMakerbot Replicator Plus | |
| Estimated price | $199,00 | $2099,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality | Makerbot |
| Release Year | 2023 | 2016 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 165x295x195 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 420x366x490 | 410x528x441 |
| Weight [kg] | 7,34 | 18,3 |
| Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | NO | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Bowden |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 230 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 250 | 150 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG e TPU (95A+) | PLA |
| Recommended slicers | Creality Print, Cura 5.0 ou superior, Prusa Slicer, Orca | MakerBot Print Software |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | 32-bit Silenciosa | |
| Display | 3,2'' + Knob | |
| Power Supply | 350 W | 110/220V / 240W |
| Connectivity | SD | USB / Wi-Fi |
| Operating systems | Windows, Linux, Macbook | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-03-06 | 2022-11-15 |
| Release date | 2023 | 2016 |
| Extra features | The Ender 3 V3 SE stands out for its easy assembly, excellent automatic bed leveling, direct extrusion and easy interface, ideal for beginners. Although it uses a coated PC board, it offers robust performance, with print speeds of up to 250mm/s, thanks to a solid construction and linear rods on the Y axis. It lacks Wi-Fi, preferring file transfer via SD card. | The Replicator Plus printer is easy to use and has very good print quality. Its software is user-friendly and powerful, with USB, Ethernet, Wi-Fi and support for printing via pen drive. With a safe design for an open frame printer, it is relatively quiet. The Smart Extruder+ detects filament end and pauses printing automatically, in addition to notifying via apps. It has a large print volume, with a non-heated and coated print bed for easy removal of parts. It also has a webcam for remote monitoring of prints. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Hardware | 0.8 / 10 | 2.5 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 2 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
| [BUY Ender 3 V3 SE] |
Conclusion |
| In conclusion, the comparison between the Ender 3 V3 SE and the Replicator Plus clearly highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each printer relative to their costs. The Ender 3 V3 SE stands out as a budget-friendly option, offering excellent performance, impressive print speeds, and a user-friendly interface that suits beginners well. It provides a solid build quality with direct drive extrusion, while the features like automatic bed leveling enhance its usability. However, it lacks advanced connectivity options and some automated features present in more expensive models. On the other hand, the Replicator Plus, while significantly more expensive, offers a larger print volume and additional functionalities such as filament end detection, Wi-Fi connectivity, and remote monitoring capabilities. Its ease of use and software support make it appealing for users who prioritize convenience and quality in their prints. However, its higher price and comparatively inferior print speed and maximum temperature can be seen as drawbacks. Overall, for those seeking a cost-effective solution that doesn't compromise too much on performance, the Ender 3 V3 SE is the superior choice. Conversely, if budget is less of a concern and advanced features, larger print volume, and reliable software support are priorities, the Replicator Plus may be worth considering despite its higher cost. |