Compare Ender 3 V3 SE vs K1
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Ender 3 V3 SE[BUY Ender 3 V3 SE] |
K1[BUY K1] |
| Buy Filament forCreality Ender 3 V3 SE | Buy Filament forCreality 3D K1 | |
| Estimated price | $199,00 | $399,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality | Creality 3D |
| Release Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 220x220x250 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 420x366x490 | 355x355x480 |
| Weight [kg] | 7,34 | 12,5 |
| Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | YES |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | NO | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 300 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 120 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 250 | 600 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG e TPU (95A+) | ABS, PLA, PETG, PET, TPU, PA, ABS, ASA, PC, PLA-CF, PA-CF, PET-CF |
| Recommended slicers | Creality Print, Cura 5.0 ou superior, Prusa Slicer, Orca | Creality Print; Cura, Simplify3D e PrusaSlicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | 32-bit Silenciosa | |
| Display | 3,2'' + Knob | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 350 W | 110/220V / 350W |
| Connectivity | SD | Ethernet / USB / Wi-Fi |
| Operating systems | Windows, Linux, Macbook | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-03-06 | 2023-04-17 |
| Release date | 2023 | 2023 |
| Extra features | The Ender 3 V3 SE stands out for its easy assembly, excellent automatic bed leveling, direct extrusion and easy interface, ideal for beginners. Although it uses a coated PC board, it offers robust performance, with print speeds of up to 250mm/s, thanks to a solid construction and linear rods on the Y axis. It lacks Wi-Fi, preferring file transfer via SD card. | The K1 is an extremely fast FDM 3D printer, reaching 600mm/s, 12 times faster than standard models. Equipped with a Core XY system and lightweight print head, it offers energy efficiency and high print quality. It stands out for its dual-gear extruder and quickly heated hotend, as well as dual cooling to prevent warping. Its robust structure ensures stability at high speed, with optimized software to speed up the printing process. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Hardware | 0.9 / 10 | 5.4 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 2 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
| [BUY Ender 3 V3 SE] | [BUY K1] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Ender 3 V3 SE and the K1 3D printers, several key factors influence the decision regarding which model offers the best overall value. The Ender 3 V3 SE, priced more affordably, is designed with beginners in mind, providing simple assembly, user-friendly features, and solid performance at standard speeds. Although it lacks advanced functionalities such as power loss recovery and a fully enclosed build, it efficiently handles common materials with reliable results. On the other hand, the K1 is notably more expensive but compensates with advanced technology and performance capabilities. Its innovative Core XY system allows for significantly faster printing speeds, superior cooling, and better handling of a variety of materials. The inclusion of features like automatic power loss recovery and a more robust structure enhances its reliability, making it more suitable for users who prioritize speed and efficiency over cost. Ultimately, if budget is a primary concern and you're looking for a straightforward, reliable printer for basic projects, the Ender 3 V3 SE is the better option. However, for those who are willing to invest more for enhanced performance and speed, particularly in professional or more demanding contexts, the K1 stands out as the superior choice. The decision hinges on balancing cost against specific printing needs and intended use. |