Compare Ender 3 V3 KE vs M5
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Ender 3 V3 KE[BUY Ender 3 V3 KE] |
M5 |
| Buy Filament forCreality Ender 3 V3 KE | Buy Filament forAnkerMake M5 | |
| Estimated price | $279,00 | $497,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality | AnkerMake |
| Release Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x240 | 235x235x250 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 433x366x490 | 502x438x470 |
| Weight [kg] | 7,8 | 12,6 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 300 | 260 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 100 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 500 | 500 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG e TPU (95A+), ASA | PLA, PETG, ABS |
| Recommended slicers | Creality Print, Cura 5.0 ou superior, Prusa Slicer, Orca | AnkerMake Studio (macOS, Windows), Simplify3D, Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | 32-bit Silenciosa | |
| Display | Touchscreen 4,3'' | Touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 350 W | 350 W |
| Connectivity | USB drive, LAN, Creality Cloud APP | Wi-Fi, USB-C, OTA Upgrade |
| Operating systems | Windows, Linux, Macbook | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-03-06 | 2024-07-08 |
| Release date | 2023 | 2023 |
| Extra features | The Ender 3 V3 KE, an advancement in the Ender line, achieves print speeds of up to 500mm/s with its touchscreen and WiFi connectivity. Although it has a slightly smaller print area than the SE model, it makes up for it with superior print quality. Its robust design, high-quality components, and intuitive wireless control are appreciated, although Creality's mobile app lacks practicality and does not have a closed system. It stands out for its linear track on the X-axis for stability at high speeds and the hotend that supports up to 300°C, ideal for high-temperature filaments. | The AnkerMake M5 printer stands out for its impressive print speed, reaching up to 500mm/s. It features AI print monitoring, an integrated camera for creating timelapses, auto-leveling bed with pressure sensor, direct extruder, flexible PEI-coated build plate, and Wi-Fi and USB-C connectivity. Assembly is quick and easy, and the printer is designed to deliver high print quality and ease of use. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 3.2 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 4 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| [BUY Ender 3 V3 KE] |
Conclusion |
| In concluding the comparison between the Ender 3 V3 KE and the AnkerMake M5, both 3D printers showcase advanced features suitable for a variety of users, yet they cater to different needs and preferences. The Ender 3 V3 KE offers a lower entry price point while providing commendable features, including a high maximum nozzle temperature and impressive print speeds. It’s particularly favorable for users who value print quality and are looking for a reliable machine without breaking the bank. The printer's compact design and robust build contribute to its accessibility for hobbyists and educators alike. On the other hand, the AnkerMake M5 presents itself as a premium option, equipped with additional functionality such as AI print monitoring and an integrated camera for timelapses. Its ease of assembly and user-friendly features make it an excellent choice for those who seek a more sophisticated 3D printing experience and are willing to invest more upfront. Both printers have automatic bed leveling and a high-quality display, reflecting modern standards in 3D printing technology. The choice ultimately hinges on the user's priorities—whether it is cost efficiency or enhanced features—making both models reliable contenders for users with differing requirements in the 3D printing landscape. |