Compare Ender 3 V3 KE vs CR 6 Max

Comparison between the best 3D printers

Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.

Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.

3D Printer Ender 3 V3 KE 3D Printer CR 6 Max
Modelo

Ender 3 V3 KE

 [BUY Ender 3 V3 KE]

CR 6 Max

Buy Filament forCreality Ender 3 V3 KE Buy Filament forCreality 3D CR 6 Max
Estimated price $279,00 $700,00
Manufacturer Creality Creality 3D
Release Year 2023 2021
Print Volume [mm] 220x220x240 400x400x400
Printer Size [mm] 433x366x490 725x640x691
Weight [kg] 7,8 14
Power Loss Recovery YES YES
Enclosed printer NO NO
Bed Leveling Automatic Automatic
Filament End Sensor YES YES
Bed type Heated Heated
Power supply system Direct Drive Bowden
Standard nozzle 0,4 0,4
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] 300 260
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] 100 90
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] 500 100
Filament holder YES YES
Camera for supervision NO NO
Recommended filaments PLA, PETG e TPU (95A+), ASA PLA, PETG
Recommended slicers Creality Print, Cura 5.0 ou superior, Prusa Slicer, Orca Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker
Maximum Resolution [mm] 0,1 0,1
Processor 32-bit Silenciosa
Display Touchscreen 4,3'' Display touchscreen 4,3''
Power Supply 350 W 110/220V / 500W
Connectivity USB drive, LAN, Creality Cloud APP SD / USB
Operating systems Windows, Linux, Macbook Windows, Mac, Linux
Date of registration in the system 2024-03-06 2022-11-04
Release date 2023 2021
Extra features The Ender 3 V3 KE, an advancement in the Ender line, achieves print speeds of up to 500mm/s with its touchscreen and WiFi connectivity. Although it has a slightly smaller print area than the SE model, it makes up for it with superior print quality. Its robust design, high-quality components, and intuitive wireless control are appreciated, although Creality's mobile app lacks practicality and does not have a closed system. It stands out for its linear track on the X-axis for stability at high speeds and the hotend that supports up to 300°C, ideal for high-temperature filaments. Creality’s CR-6 Max printer offers a large 400 x 400 x 400mm build area, perfect for larger projects without dividers. Its auto-leveling system and force sensor simplify setup. It has a 4.3-inch touchscreen and convenient features like a tool drawer and filament holder. Plus, its modular hotend, redesigned extruder, and silicon carbide-coated build plate improve print quality.
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) NO NO

Notes *

Cost-benefit 7 / 10 6 / 10
Hardware 3.2 / 10 2.4 / 10
Tela . .
Print volume 3 / 10 4 / 10
Performance 4 / 10 1 / 10
 [BUY Ender 3 V3 KE]

Conclusion

In comparing the Creality Ender 3 V3 KE and the CR-6 Max, it becomes clear that both printers serve different user needs and priorities, but the Ender 3 V3 KE offers a superior cost-benefit ratio and performance for hobbyists and small-scale users.

The Ender 3 V3 KE, being significantly more affordable, delivers impressive print speeds of up to 500mm/s and supports high-temperature filaments, making it highly versatile for various projects. Its compact print volume is adequate for many users, and the presence of features like a direct drive system and power loss recovery enhances its usability. The intuitive user interface and wireless control through Creality's application, despite its limitations, contribute positively to the user experience.

On the other hand, the CR-6 Max, while providing a robust build volume that's ideal for larger projects, comes at a much higher price point with performance metrics that do not favorably compare to the Ender 3 V3 KE. Although it includes thoughtful features like a modular hotend and improved print quality components, the overall cost-effectiveness and speed do not match the value offered by the Ender 3 V3 KE.

Ultimately, for users who prioritize affordability, speed, and versatility in their 3D printing endeavors, the Ender 3 V3 KE stands as the better choice. Conversely, the CR-6 Max may appeal more to those who require larger print volumes and are willing to invest more for additional features, despite its shortcomings in performance relative to cost. Therefore, the decision should align with individual project needs and budget considerations.