Compare Ender 3 V2 vs M5C
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Ender 3 V2[BUY Ender 3 V2] |
M5C[BUY M5C] |
| Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 3 V2 | Buy Filament forAnkerMake M5C | |
| Estimated price | $289,00 | $399,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality 3D | AnkerMake |
| Release Year | 2022 | 2023 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 220x220x250 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 470x475x620 | 466x374x480 |
| Weight [kg] | 7,8 | 9,6 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Manual | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | NO | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 255 | 300 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 100 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 180 | 500 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, TPU, ABS, PETG | PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS, PA, PLA-CF, PETG-CF, PA-CF |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r | AnkerMake Studio (macOS, Windows), Simplify3D, Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | 32 bits | |
| Display | Touchscreen TFT 4,3'' | |
| Power Supply | 24V / 360W | 350 W |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | Wi-Fi, USB-C, Bluetooth |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Linux e Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2021-04-15 | 2024-09-11 |
| Release date | 2022 | 2023 |
| Extra features | The Creality Ender-3 V2, with a design inspired by the Prusa i3 series, stands out for its DIY assembly structure. With an area of ??250x250x250mm, it supports a variety of projects. It has a micro-USB port, microSD slot and integrated tool drawer. The tension adjustment adapts to different regions. Its manual print bed leveling process requires attention, but offers an enriching experience. Ideal for 3D printing enthusiasts willing to invest time in assembly and adjustment. | The AnkerMake M5 printer stands out for its impressive print speed, reaching up to 500mm/s. It features AI print monitoring, an integrated camera for creating timelapses, auto-leveling bed with pressure sensor, direct extruder, flexible PEI-coated build plate, and Wi-Fi and USB-C connectivity. Assembly is quick and easy, and the printer is designed to deliver high print quality and ease of use. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2.1 / 10 | 3.2 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| [BUY Ender 3 V2] | [BUY M5C] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Ender 3 V2 and the AnkerMake M5C, both printers offer similar print volumes and bed types, but they cater to different user needs and preferences. The Ender 3 V2, offering a more budget-friendly option, is ideal for DIY enthusiasts who enjoy hands-on assembly and manual bed leveling. Its lower cost and compatibility with various filament types make it a practical choice for hobbyists looking to experiment without breaking the bank. However, its manual adjustments and slower print speed may be seen as drawbacks for those seeking efficiency and ease of use. Conversely, the AnkerMake M5C, while priced higher, provides a range of advanced features that enhance the user experience. With automatic bed leveling, faster print speeds, and improved connectivity options such as Wi-Fi, it is tailored for those who prioritize convenience and rapid production. The direct drive extruder further expands its capabilities with a wider variety of filament types, including specialty materials. Ultimately, the decision between these two printers should consider your budget, experience level, and specific printing needs. The Ender 3 V2 may suit a beginner or budget-conscious user, while the M5C is likely better suited for those willing to invest in a more advanced machine for faster and potentially more versatile printing experiences. |