Compare Ender 3 V2 Neo vs Photo Mono 4 Ultra

Comparison between the best 3D printers

Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.

Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.

Modelo	Ender 3 V2 Neo  [BUY Ender 3 V2 Neo]	Photo Mono 4 Ultra  [BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra]
	Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 3 V2 Neo	Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra
Estimated price	$310,00	$250,00
Manufacturer	Creality 3D	Anycubic
Release Year	2022	2024
Print Volume [mm]	220x220x250	153x87x165
Printer Size [mm]	438x424x472	231x236x430
Weight [kg]	9,8	5
Power Loss Recovery	YES	YES
Maximum Resolution [mm]	0,1	0,01
Processor	4.2.2 mainboard
Display	Display touchscreen 4,3''	Touchscreen 4.3''
Power Supply
Connectivity	SD / USB	USB
Operating systems	Windows, Mac, Linux	Windows, Mac
Date of registration in the system	2022-12-09	2024-12-13
Release date	2022	2024
Extra features	The Ender 3 V2 Neo printer stands out for its automatic bed leveling with the CR Touch system, ensuring high-quality initial layers. It features an all-metal Bowden extruder for increased durability and improved filament handling. Its flexible, PC-coated magnetic build plate makes it easy to remove prints and is durable and easy to clean. It also includes a new user interface with model preview and an updated gantry design. The Ender 3 V2 Neo maintains the same build volume and temperatures as the previous version, supporting popular filaments such as PLA and ABS. It features a quiet 32-bit mainboard and additional features such as a filament sensor, print recovery, simple 3-step assembly, an integrated toolbox, and belt tensioners.	The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 Ultra features 10K resolution (9024x5120) with 17x17um pixels and high light uniformity (>=90%) enabled by the COB system with Fresnel lens and uniformity algorithm. It offers a build volume of 153.4x87x165 mm and speeds up to 120 mm/h with high-performance resin. It includes assisted leveling, built-in Wi-Fi, and a redesigned platform for better adhesion and easy model removal. Additionally, it has a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials.
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS)	NO	NO
Notes *
Cost-benefit	7 / 10	8 / 10
Hardware	2.8 / 10	6.3 / 10
Tela	.	.
Print volume	3 / 10	3 / 10
Performance	0 / 10	9 / 10
	[BUY Ender 3 V2 Neo]	[BUY Photo Mono 4 Ultra]

Conclusion

In evaluating the Ender 3 V2 Neo and the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra, both printers present distinct advantages tailored to different user needs. The Ender 3 V2 Neo, while slightly more expensive, offers a larger print volume and is best suited for users who prioritize versatility in filament types and sizes. Its features like automatic bed leveling, a solid all-metal design, and a user-friendly touchscreen interface enhance the overall printing experience, making it a reliable choice for traditional FDM printing. The printer's specifications and additional features suggest a robust and durable machine ideal for hobbyists and those looking for an entry-point into more complex designs. On the other hand, the Photo Mono 4 Ultra excels in precision with its 10K resolution and impressive print speed, making it the preferable option for users focused on high-detail resin prints. Despite its smaller build volume, the enhancements in light uniformity and print adhesion cater well to detailed and intricate models. Additionally, features like built-in Wi-Fi and assisted leveling streamline the user experience, especially for those engaging in high-quality prototyping or detailed artwork. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers depends largely on the user's printing goals. If larger prints and material versatility are the priority, the Ender 3 V2 Neo stands out. However, for those seeking exceptional detail in smaller prints, the Anycubic Photo Mono 4 Ultra represents a compelling option. In terms of cost-benefit, both models perform well, with the Anycubic showing a slightly stronger value proposition for users focused on high-resolution applications.