Compare Ender 3 V2 Neo vs M5C

Comparison between the best 3D printers

Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.

Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.

3D Printer Ender 3 V2 Neo 3D Printer M5C
Modelo

Ender 3 V2 Neo

 [BUY Ender 3 V2 Neo]

M5C

 [BUY M5C]
Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 3 V2 Neo Buy Filament forAnkerMake M5C
Estimated price $310,00 $399,00
Manufacturer Creality 3D AnkerMake
Release Year 2022 2023
Print Volume [mm] 220x220x250 220x220x250
Printer Size [mm] 438x424x472 466x374x480
Weight [kg] 9,8 9,6
Power Loss Recovery YES YES
Enclosed printer NO NO
Bed Leveling Automatic Automatic
Filament End Sensor YES YES
Bed type Heated Heated
Power supply system Bowden Direct Drive
Standard nozzle 0,4 0,4
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] 260 300
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] 100 100
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] 80 500
Filament holder YES YES
Camera for supervision NO NO
Recommended filaments PLA, PETG PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS, PA, PLA-CF, PETG-CF, PA-CF
Recommended slicers Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker AnkerMake Studio (macOS, Windows), Simplify3D, Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer
Maximum Resolution [mm] 0,1 0,1
Processor 4.2.2 mainboard
Display Display touchscreen 4,3''
Power Supply 350 W
Connectivity SD / USB Wi-Fi, USB-C, Bluetooth
Operating systems Windows, Mac, Linux Windows, Linux e Macbook
Date of registration in the system 2022-12-09 2024-09-11
Release date 2022 2023
Extra features The Ender 3 V2 Neo printer stands out for its automatic bed leveling with the CR Touch system, ensuring high-quality initial layers. It features an all-metal Bowden extruder for increased durability and improved filament handling. Its flexible, PC-coated magnetic build plate makes it easy to remove prints and is durable and easy to clean. It also includes a new user interface with model preview and an updated gantry design. The Ender 3 V2 Neo maintains the same build volume and temperatures as the previous version, supporting popular filaments such as PLA and ABS. It features a quiet 32-bit mainboard and additional features such as a filament sensor, print recovery, simple 3-step assembly, an integrated toolbox, and belt tensioners. The AnkerMake M5 printer stands out for its impressive print speed, reaching up to 500mm/s. It features AI print monitoring, an integrated camera for creating timelapses, auto-leveling bed with pressure sensor, direct extruder, flexible PEI-coated build plate, and Wi-Fi and USB-C connectivity. Assembly is quick and easy, and the printer is designed to deliver high print quality and ease of use.
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) NO NO

Notes *

Cost-benefit 7 / 10 7 / 10
Hardware 3.2 / 10 3.6 / 10
Tela . .
Print volume 3 / 10 3 / 10
Performance 0 / 10 4 / 10
 [BUY Ender 3 V2 Neo]  [BUY M5C]

Conclusion

In comparing the Ender 3 V2 Neo and the AnkerMake M5C, both printers offer solid features, but they cater to different user priorities and budgets.

The **Ender 3 V2 Neo**, released in 2022, is a cost-effective choice with reliable performance, automatic bed leveling, and a heated build plate. It is designed for users seeking greater simplicity and functionality at a lower price point. The printer supports popular filaments and has a print recovery feature, making it a good option for those new to 3D printing or looking for a dependable machine for standard prints.

On the other hand, the **AnkerMake M5C** is a more advanced model, launched in 2023. It boasts exceptional maximum printing speeds, advanced connectivity options like Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, and a robust direct-drive extrusion system. These features make it appealing for users who prioritize speed, versatility with various filaments, and a range of more advanced capabilities. However, these enhancements come at a higher price.

In summary, if budget is your primary concern and you're looking for a reliable entry-level printer, the Ender 3 V2 Neo is the better option. Alternatively, for users willing to invest more for superior features and speed for more demanding projects, the AnkerMake M5C is worth considering. Ultimately, the choice depends on the specific needs and priorities of the user regarding performance versus price.