Compare Ender 3 S1 vs Photo Mono 4
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Model | Ender 3 S1[BUY Ender 3 S1] |
Photo Mono 4[BUY Photo Mono 4] |
| Printing Material | Filament | Resin |
| Buy Filament for Creality 3D Ender 3 S1 | Buy Resin forAnycubic Photo Mono 4 | |
| Estimated price | $399,00 | $200,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Anycubic |
| Release Year | 2021 | 2024 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x270 | 153x87x165 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 455x490x625 | 300x300x480 |
| Weight [kg] | 9,1 | 4 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,05 | 0,01 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Display 4,3'' | Touchscreen 2.8'' |
| Power Supply | ||
| Connectivity | SD / USB | USB |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac |
| Date of registration in the system | 2023-03-28 | 2024-12-13 |
| Release date | 2021 | 2024 |
| Extra features | The Creality Ender 3 S1 printer stands out for its easy assembly and quiet operation. It has automatic bed leveling and a direct drive system, providing high-quality prints. The design is sleek, with flat cables in mesh sleeves and a magnetic bed. The Creality Sprite extruder is lightweight and developed in-house, supporting a maximum nozzle temperature of 260 degrees. It includes a filament run-out sensor and power loss recovery, with a dual Z-axis for greater support and stability. The build plate is flexible steel with PC coating, and the printer supports a wide variety of filaments. | The Anycubic Photon Mono 4 features 10K resolution (9024x5120), ensuring precise details with pixels of 17x17um. Its laser-engraved platform 2.0 offers excellent adhesion and easy model removal. Equipped with LighTurbo matrix lighting, it provides uniform illumination, reducing layer lines and rasterization. It has a print volume of 153.4x87x165 mm, 4-point manual leveling, and a print resumption function after power outages, optimizing time and materials. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2.4 / 10 | 6.3 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
| [BUY Ender 3 S1] | [BUY Photo Mono 4] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Ender 3 S1 and the Anycubic Photo Mono 4, several factors come into play that cater to different user needs. The Ender 3 S1, while priced higher, offers a significantly larger print volume, making it a suitable choice for users who require larger prints or want more flexibility in their projects. Its advanced features such as automatic bed leveling, a direct drive system, and a durable build with a flexible steel bed cater to those seeking reliability and ease of use. These aspects reflect in its overall cost-benefit, although it scores moderately in hardware performance. On the other hand, the Anycubic Photo Mono 4, which is more budget-friendly, excels in resolution and detail precision, making it ideal for users focused on high-detail prints, such as miniatures or intricate models. Its features, like the 10K resolution and LighTurbo matrix lighting, are particularly beneficial for professionals in fields such as prototyping or art, where fine details are crucial. Ultimately, the choice between these two printers should be guided by individual printing needs: if larger capacity and versatile material handling are priorities, the Ender 3 S1 is a strong contender. Conversely, for high-resolution detailing at a lower price point, the Anycubic Photon Mono 4 stands out as an excellent option. Both printers have their strengths, making them valuable assets for different types of users in the 3D printing landscape. |