Compare Ender 3 S1 Plus vs Photon M3 Premium
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | Ender 3 S1 Plus[BUY Ender 3 S1 Plus] |
Photon M3 Premium[BUY Photon M3 Premium] |
Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 3 S1 Plus | Buy Resin forAnycubic Photon M3 Premium | |
Estimated price | $549,00 | $600,00 |
Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Anycubic |
Release Year | 2022 | 2022 |
Print Volume [mm] | 300x300x300 | 123x219x250 |
Printer Size [mm] | 557x535x655 | 330x350x630 |
Weight [kg] | 10,25 | 19 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
Processor | ||
Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
Power Supply | 110/220V / 350W | 150 W |
Connectivity | SD / USB | USB / Wi-Fi |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | |
Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-04 | 2023-01-19 |
Release date | 2022 | 2022 |
Extra features | The Ender 3 S1 Plus 3D Printer offers quality prints with a build volume of 300x300x300 mm. It stands out for its "Sprite" extruder, automatic bed leveling and easy-to-use touchscreen. It has excellent safety features and simple assembly. In addition, it features temperature uniformity in the heated bed, suitable for various materials. | The Anycubic Photon M3 Premium Printer features MSLA technology with a 10-inch monochrome LCD screen and 8K resolution, ensuring prints with fine details thanks to the 28.5 micron resolution. It has a generous build volume (219 x 123 x 250 mm), an intelligent cooling system for greater durability, and a laser-etched build plate for better adhesion. It offers dual air filters, reducing odors, and the promise of compatibility with the Anycubic Cloud app. Its design includes an Art Deco-style UV curved glass and an efficient leveling system for the build platform. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
Hardware | 3.2 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 1 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
[BUY Ender 3 S1 Plus] | [BUY Photon M3 Premium] |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Ender 3 S1 Plus and the Photon M3 Premium, both models represent solid options within the 3D printing market, with each catering to different printing needs and preferences. The **Ender 3 S1 Plus** excels in print volume, allowing for larger builds, and features a robust set of functionalities including automatic bed leveling and a strong heated bed that supports a variety of materials. Additionally, it offers power loss recovery, ensuring continuity in printing even during power interruptions. However, its performance score indicates that while it allows for versatile use, the quality of prints may not rival that of more precision-targeted machines. Conversely, the **Photon M3 Premium** showcases superior resolution, contributing to the production of highly detailed prints, particularly valuable for intricate projects. Its advanced print technology and intelligent cooling system ensure a higher level of detail in prints and overall operational efficiency. However, it compromises on print volume in comparison to the Ender, which may limit the size of projects. Moreover, the lack of power loss recovery may be a drawback for users looking for reliability in environments prone to interruptions. When it comes to cost-benefit analysis, the Photon M3 Premium grades slightly better, reflecting its high performance and resolution capabilities, while the Ender 3 S1 Plus provides a more versatile, albeit not as high-performing, option at a marginally lower price point. In conclusion, your choice between the two should align with your specific printing needs: opt for the **Ender 3 S1 Plus** if you need larger build sizes and practical features for diverse printing projects, or choose the **Photon M3 Premium** if your priorities lie in achieving fine details and superior print quality in smaller models. Each printer has its strengths and limitations, making the ideal selection dependent on personal project requirements and preferences. |