Compare Core A2V2 vs Mars 3 PRO
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | Core A2V2 |
Mars 3 PRO |
Buy Filament forGTMax Core A2V2 | Buy Resin forElegoo Mars 3 PRO | |
Estimated price | $684,00 | $300,00 |
Manufacturer | GTMax | Elegoo |
Release Year | 2019 | 2022 |
Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x240 | 143x89x175 |
Printer Size [mm] | 425x460x512 | 227x227x438 |
Weight [kg] | 5,5 | |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,05 | 0,01 |
Processor | ||
Display | Mono | Touchscreen TFT 3,5'' |
Power Supply | ||
Connectivity | SD / USB | USB |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | |
Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-12 | 2022-11-07 |
Release date | 2019 | 2022 |
Extra features | The GTMax3D ProCore A2v2 is a compact and robust 3D printer with a printing area of ??220 x 220 x 240 mm. It offers high print quality, ranging from 0.05 mm to 0.32 mm. Its features include automatic filament detection and changing, travel speed of up to 300 mm/s, and a heated aluminum bed with a glass top. It has automatic bed leveling with 16 points and an all-metal hotend that reaches up to 298°C. The printer has a carbon steel frame with electrostatic painting, is automatic bivolt and has connectivity via USB and SD card. The Bowden system and core xy kinematics complete its advanced features. | The Elegoo Mars 3 PRO printer stands out for its special features, such as its high printing resolution, which guarantees sharp and detailed prints with 35 microns. It includes a replaceable air purification module, which facilitates maintenance and improves air quality during printing. The device's LCD screen is scratch-resistant, increasing its durability, and a strong point is the uniform distribution of light, guaranteed by a Fresnel lens. This lens ensures more uniform curing of printed objects, contributing to superior print quality. With these features, the Elegoo Mars 3 PRO presents itself as a robust and efficient choice for resin 3D printing. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Hardware | 2.5 / 10 | 1.6 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 1 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
Conclusion |
In comparing the Core A2V2 and the Mars 3 PRO 3D printers, several factors emerge that help to discern their strengths and weaknesses, leading to a well-informed conclusion. The Core A2V2, while priced higher, offers a larger print volume, more robust construction, automatic filament detection, and advanced features like automatic bed leveling and a heated aluminum bed. Its versatility in print quality and material capabilities makes it a strong contender for those looking for a durable and functional 3D printer for a variety of projects. However, it's worth noting that its performance rating is relatively low, which may deter users seeking high fidelity in printing. On the other hand, the Mars 3 PRO excels in print resolution, capable of achieving extremely fine details, and superior performance metrics. Its features, including a replaceable air purification module and a Fresnel lens for light distribution, enhance the overall printing experience and output quality. The lower price tag is appealing; however, its print volume can be a limiting factor for users with larger scale projects. While the Core A2V2 provides a broader scope in terms of size and material flexibility, the Mars 3 PRO focuses on delivering unparalleled detail and precision in resin printing. When evaluating cost-effectiveness, the Mars 3 PRO ranks higher, making it an attractive option for users who prioritize fine detail over size. In conclusion, if you're looking for a versatile machine that handles various materials and offers larger print capabilities, the Core A2V2 is a worthwhile investment. Conversely, for those who require high-resolution prints and prioritize detail, the Mars 3 PRO represents a better value for money with current technology. Ultimately, the decision hinges on individual printing needs and project specifications. |