Compare Comgrow T500 vs Kobra 3 Max Combo
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Model | Comgrow T500 |
Kobra 3 Max Combo |
| Printing Material | Filament | Filament |
| Buy Filament for Sovol Comgrow T500 | Buy Filament forAnycubic Kobra 3 Max Combo | |
| Estimated price | $799,00 | $699,00 |
| Manufacturer | Sovol | Anycubic |
| Release Year | 2024 | 2025 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 500x500x500 | 420x420x500 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 817x810x962 | 640x753x706 |
| Weight [kg] | 39 | 23,6 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Direct Drive | Bowden |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 300 | 300 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 80 | 90 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 500 | 600 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG, Fibra de Carbono, TPU | PLA, PETG, TPU |
| Recommended slicers | Creality Print, Cura 5.0 ou superior, Prusa Slicer, Orca | Anycubic Slicer, Cura, Orca Slicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | 7'' IPS touchscreen, 60Hz | Touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 500 W | 800 W |
| Connectivity | USB, Wifi | |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | |
| Date of registration in the system | 2024-07-18 | 2025-03-06 |
| Release date | 2024 | 2025 |
| Extra features | The Sovol Comgrow T500 stands out for its large print volume of 500x500x500 mm, ideal for large-scale projects. It has a direct extruder with a gear ratio of 6.5:1, speeds of up to 200 mm/s, and high-performance motors. The 7" touchscreen with Klipper software makes navigation easy. The 49-point automatic leveling ensures a perfect first layer. It also has a full metal hotend at 300°C, linear rails on all axes, and WiFi connectivity. | The Anycubic Kobra 3 Max Combo combines high-speed and multicolor printing with up to 8 colors. It features automatic leveling, quick filament switching, clog and entanglement detection, and AI to prevent print failures. Its 800W hotbed heats up quickly, while 10,000mm/s² acceleration ensures efficiency. App and Wi-Fi control, print recovery, and video monitoring enhance the user experience. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | YES |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 3.6 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 5 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Performance | 4 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
Conclusion |
| In conclusion, both the Comgrow T500 and the Anycubic Kobra 3 Max Combo demonstrate notable features making them compelling options for different types of users. The Comgrow T500 excels in its larger print volume, making it ideal for those looking to produce larger projects. Its robust build and efficiency are emphasized by features like direct drive and a sizable touchscreen display. On the other hand, the Kobra 3 Max Combo shines with its emphasis on high-speed printing and multi-color capabilities, appealing to creators interested in intricate designs and versatility in materials. Regarding user experience, the Kobra 3 Max Combo offers advantageous features such as clog detection and faster heating times, enhancing the overall printing process. However, both printers benefit from automatic bed leveling and filament sensor technology, ensuring user-friendly operation. Price-wise, while the Comgrow T500 is slightly more expensive, it compensates with its superior print volume and sturdiness. The Kobra 3 Max Combo, being the more cost-effective option, provides solid performance and advanced features. Ultimately, the choice between the two will largely depend on specific needs: whether a larger build space or enhanced multi-color functionality is a priority will steer the decision-making process. Both printers exhibit strong value for the money within their respective configurations, achieving a balanced score in the cost-benefit analysis. |