Compare Comgrow T300 vs Photon M3 Plus
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | Comgrow T300 |
Photon M3 Plus |
Buy Filament forSovol Comgrow T300 | Buy Resin forAnycubic Photon M3 Plus | |
Estimated price | $449,00 | $430,00 |
Manufacturer | Sovol | Anycubic |
Release Year | 2024 | 2022 |
Print Volume [mm] | 300x300x350 | 197x122x245 |
Printer Size [mm] | 503x631x831 | 290x360x475 |
Weight [kg] | 17 | 11 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
Processor | 64 bit | |
Display | Touchscreen 5'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
Power Supply | 150 W | 150 W |
Connectivity | USB, WiFi | USB / Wi-Fi |
Operating systems | Windows, Linux, Macbook | |
Date of registration in the system | 2024-05-10 | 2023-01-19 |
Release date | 2024 | 2022 |
Extra features | The Sovol Comgrow T300 printer stands out for its technological innovations and advanced features. With a print size of 300mm300mm350mm, the T300 offers true linear rails on all axes, ensuring greater stability. Its Klipper-based intelligent core and 64-bit microcomputer increase printing speed and quality through pressure advancement and input shaping. The extruder with a gear ratio of 6.5:1 allows for more precise material control, optimizing the printing of flexible materials. In addition, the T300 features a rapid filament cooling system with a high-speed fan and a circular duct piece that improves cooling efficiency. With a 4.3-inch high-refresh rate touchscreen and an 81-point automatic leveling system, the T300 simplifies the preparation and execution of 3D prints. | The Photon M3 Plus printer stands out for its automatic resin filling system, capable of keeping the tank always full. It offers wireless connectivity and support for the Anycubic Cloud app, allowing remote control and monitoring, including with an optional camera. Its 34-micron resolution, provided by a 9.25-inch monochrome LCD screen, ensures high-precision prints. Printing speed is remarkable, with a layer curing in 1.5 seconds. Other features include a large build volume, laser-etched build plate, and compatibility with a wash and cure station. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 8 / 10 | 8 / 10 |
Hardware | 4 / 10 | 3.2 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
Performance | 5 / 10 | 9 / 10 |
Conclusion |
When comparing the Comgrow T300 and the Photon M3 Plus, both 3D printers cater to distinct user needs, offering unique strengths and features that can significantly impact the overall user experience. The Comgrow T300, released in 2024, excels in print volume and versatility, featuring a larger build space which allows users to create bigger prints. It includes advanced technology such as true linear rails on all axes, a high-refresh touchscreen, and a sophisticated extruder design, making it an excellent choice for users who prioritize speed and stability in their printing processes. Additionally, its power loss recovery feature adds an important safety net for lengthy prints. On the other hand, the Photon M3 Plus, while slightly older, boasts impressive resolution and speed capabilities, making it particularly suited for users who require high precision in resin printing. Its ability to maintain a consistently filled resin tank and the integration of the Anycubic Cloud app for remote control enhance its usability. Furthermore, the Photon M3 Plus’s design focuses on ensuring detailed prints with high-resolution capabilities, albeit at a smaller build volume. From a cost-benefit perspective, both printers score similarly, indicating that each offers good value for its respective features. Ultimately, the choice between the two should be guided by the specific needs of the user. If larger prints and firmware innovation are the priority, the Comgrow T300 would be the preferable option. Conversely, for those seeking precision in smaller prints, the Photon M3 Plus stands out as a strong contender. Both models represent solid investments for different applications, ensuring a thoughtful choice can enhance your 3D printing experience. |