Compare Comgrow T300 vs Photon M3 Max

Comparison between the best 3D printers

Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.

Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.

3D Printer Comgrow T300 3D Printer Photon M3 Max
Modelo

Comgrow T300

Photon M3 Max

Buy Filament forSovol Comgrow T300 Buy Resin forAnycubic Photon M3 Max
Estimated price $449,00 $960,00
Manufacturer Sovol Anycubic
Release Year 2024 2022
Print Volume [mm] 300x300x350 298x164x300
Printer Size [mm] 503x631x831 400x408x596
Weight [kg] 17 21
Power Loss Recovery YES NO
Maximum Resolution [mm] 0,1 0,01
Processor 64 bit
Display Touchscreen 5'' Display touchscreen 4,3''
Power Supply 150 W 150 W
Connectivity USB, WiFi USB / Wi-Fi
Operating systems Windows, Linux, Macbook Windows, Mac, Linux
Date of registration in the system 2024-05-10 2023-01-19
Release date 2024 2022
Extra features The Sovol Comgrow T300 printer stands out for its technological innovations and advanced features. With a print size of 300mm300mm350mm, the T300 offers true linear rails on all axes, ensuring greater stability. Its Klipper-based intelligent core and 64-bit microcomputer increase printing speed and quality through pressure advancement and input shaping. The extruder with a gear ratio of 6.5:1 allows for more precise material control, optimizing the printing of flexible materials. In addition, the T300 features a rapid filament cooling system with a high-speed fan and a circular duct piece that improves cooling efficiency. With a 4.3-inch high-refresh rate touchscreen and an 81-point automatic leveling system, the T300 simplifies the preparation and execution of 3D prints. The Anycubic Photon M3 Max printer stands out for its large build volume of 298 x 164 x 300 mm, allowing the printing of large and detailed models. It has a 13.6-inch 7K monochrome screen, offering XY resolution of 46 microns, ensuring high-precision prints. It includes an innovative automatic resin refill system and a frosted glass-style FEP blade, improving part release. Its design includes a two-part acrylic cover, facilitating internal access, and a printing platform with aluminum side handles for easy handling.
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) NO NO

Notes *

Cost-benefit 8 / 10 7 / 10
Hardware 4 / 10 4 / 10
Tela . .
Print volume 4 / 10 3 / 10
Performance 5 / 10 9 / 10

Conclusion

In comparing the Comgrow T300 and the Anycubic Photon M3 Max 3D printers, several factors come into play that highlight their strengths and weaknesses, ultimately guiding potential buyers toward the option that best suits their needs.

The Comgrow T300 offers a larger print volume, making it more suitable for users who need to print larger models or multiple items at once. It also features advanced technological innovations, such as true linear rails for increased stability and a Klipper-based intelligent core that enhances printing speed and quality. Additionally, the T300 has power loss recovery, which is a significant advantage for users concerned about interruptions during long print jobs. Its user-friendly interface and automation features further contribute to a seamless printing experience.

On the other hand, the Photon M3 Max, while having a smaller print volume, is engineered for high precision with its impressive XY resolution and monochrome screen. This makes it an excellent choice for detail-oriented prints, such as miniatures or intricate designs. The automatic resin refill system is another noteworthy feature that enhances usability, particularly for those who regularly work with resin materials.

While the T300 demonstrates superior cost-benefit value alongside its broader ease of use and flexibility, the Photon M3 Max excels in delivering high-definition prints and specialized functionalities for resin users.

In conclusion, if your priority is larger print capabilities and innovative features for general use, the Comgrow T300 is the better choice. However, for users focusing on detailed and high-resolution printing, the Anycubic Photon M3 Max remains a solid contender, albeit at a higher price point. The ultimate decision will depend on your specific printing requirements, budget, and preference for material types.