Compare CR 6 Max vs Mega S
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | CR 6 Max |
Mega S |
| Buy Filament forCreality 3D CR 6 Max | Buy Filament forAnycubic Mega S | |
| Estimated price | $700,00 | $149,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Anycubic |
| Release Year | 2021 | 2019 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 400x400x400 | 210x210x205 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 725x640x691 | 405x410x452 |
| Weight [kg] | 14 | 14,5 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Manual |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Bowden |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 260 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 90 | 110 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 100 | 100 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG | PLA, TPU, ABS, PETG |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | 8 bits | |
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Touchscreen TFT 2,8'' |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 500W | 12V / 300W |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | SD / USB |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-04 | 2021-04-15 |
| Release date | 2021 | 2019 |
| Extra features | Crealitys CR-6 Max printer offers a large 400 x 400 x 400mm build area, perfect for larger projects without dividers. Its auto-leveling system and force sensor simplify setup. It has a 4.3-inch touchscreen and convenient features like a tool drawer and filament holder. Plus, its modular hotend, redesigned extruder, and silicon carbide-coated build plate improve print quality. | The Anycubic Mega S offers a printing platform with excellent adhesion, easy removal after cooling. It has a filament sensor for a better experience with flexible materials and a multilingual and intuitive color touchscreen. Assembly is quick, requiring only 8 screws and 3 connections. It has a large build volume (210 x 210 x 205 mm), high positioning accuracy and supports a variety of materials, including TPU, PLA, ABS and wood. It stands out for its solid metal structure, superior stability, high-quality printing with layer resolution of up to 50 microns, Ultrabase for easy adhesion and removal of parts, resumption of printing after power outage, high-quality extruder for flexible filaments, suspended filament support and stable structure that reduces shaking, improving printing quality. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2.8 / 10 | 2 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 4 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
Conclusion |
| In conclusion, when comparing the Creality CR-6 Max and the Anycubic Mega S, several factors come into play beyond just the initial price tag. The CR-6 Max offers a significantly larger print volume, making it ideal for users working on large projects or those who require the ability to print bigger objects without the need for assembly. Its automatic bed leveling system and advanced features, such as a tool drawer and modular hotend, enhance user convenience and print quality. On the other hand, the Anycubic Mega S presents a highly affordable option with a solid build quality and quick assembly process. While it has a smaller print volume, it is versatile, supporting a variety of filament types, including flexible materials. Its Ultrabase technology facilitates easy part removal, emphasizing practicality in everyday use. Considering the cost-benefit ratios, the Mega S edges out with a slightly better score due to its affordability and user-friendliness, while the CR-6 Max garners higher marks for print volume and features suited for ambitious projects. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on the user's specific needs—whether prioritizing a larger workspace and advanced features or focusing on budget-friendly versatility and ease of use. |