Compare CR 6 Max vs Kobra 3 Max Combo
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Model | CR 6 Max |
Kobra 3 Max Combo |
| Printing Material | Filament | Filament |
| Buy Filament for Creality 3D CR 6 Max | Buy Filament forAnycubic Kobra 3 Max Combo | |
| Estimated price | $700,00 | $699,00 |
| Manufacturer | Creality 3D | Anycubic |
| Release Year | 2021 | 2025 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 400x400x400 | 420x420x500 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 725x640x691 | 640x753x706 |
| Weight [kg] | 14 | 23,6 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Automatic | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Bowden |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 300 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 90 | 90 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 100 | 600 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG | PLA, PETG, TPU |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker | Anycubic Slicer, Cura, Orca Slicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Display touchscreen 4,3'' | Touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 500W | 800 W |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | USB, Wifi |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-04 | 2025-03-06 |
| Release date | 2021 | 2025 |
| Extra features | Crealitys CR-6 Max printer offers a large 400 x 400 x 400mm build area, perfect for larger projects without dividers. Its auto-leveling system and force sensor simplify setup. It has a 4.3-inch touchscreen and convenient features like a tool drawer and filament holder. Plus, its modular hotend, redesigned extruder, and silicon carbide-coated build plate improve print quality. | The Anycubic Kobra 3 Max Combo combines high-speed and multicolor printing with up to 8 colors. It features automatic leveling, quick filament switching, clog and entanglement detection, and AI to prevent print failures. Its 800W hotbed heats up quickly, while 10,000mm/s² acceleration ensures efficiency. App and Wi-Fi control, print recovery, and video monitoring enhance the user experience. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | YES |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2.4 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 4 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 5 / 10 |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Creality CR 6 Max and the Anycubic Kobra 3 Max Combo, both printers offer notable features and capabilities, catering to different user preferences and requirements. The Creality CR 6 Max stands out with its large print volume and solid build quality, featuring an automatic bed leveling system and user-friendly touchscreen interface. However, it lacks some advanced features found in more modern printers, such as multicolor printing and enhanced connectivity options. On the other hand, the Anycubic Kobra 3 Max Combo, released more recently, provides superior speed and performance. Its ability to support multicolor printing through automatic material switching, along with advanced detection systems to prevent common print issues, adds considerable value. Additionally, the Kobra's quicker heating capabilities and Wi-Fi connectivity further enhance its user experience, making it appealing for users who prioritize efficiency and convenience. Considering cost-effectiveness, while both printers are similarly priced, the Kobra 3 Max Combo offers a better overall value with its enhanced capabilities and modern features. For users looking for versatility, speed, and multicolor printing, the Anycubic Kobra 3 Max Combo is the more advantageous choice. In contrast, the Creality CR 6 Max may appeal to those mainly focused on reliable performance for larger prints without the need for complex features. Ultimately, the decision between the two should be based on specific printing needs, whether prioritizing print quality and volume or advanced functionality and speed. |