Compare Bluer vs Neptune 3 PRO
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Bluer |
Neptune 3 PRO |
| Buy Filament forTwoTrees Bluer | Buy Filament forElegoo Neptune 3 PRO | |
| Estimated price | $169,00 | $230,00 |
| Manufacturer | TwoTrees | Elegoo |
| Release Year | 2019 | 2022 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 230x230x280 | 225x225x280 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 400x410x520 | 445x515x475 |
| Weight [kg] | 8 | 8,1 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Manual | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 260 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 100 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 200 | 80 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker e outros |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | MKS Robin Nano V1.2 + TMC2208 | |
| Display | Touchscreen TFT 3,5'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 240W | 250 |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2021-09-20 | 2023-03-02 |
| Release date | 2019 | 2022 |
| Extra features | The Bluer offers interesting features such as automatic bed leveling, a 3.5-inch color touchscreen for easy operation, and a filament sensor to prevent print failures. It has a robust metal extruder and a generous 230 x 230 x 280 mm print volume, suitable for a variety of projects. The community mentions improvements made by Two Trees based on feedback, increasing its reliability. | The Elegoo Neptune 3 Pro printer stands out for its easy assembly and automatic bed leveling, ideal for different levels of users. Equipped with a direct-drive extruder and dual gears, it offers excellent adhesion to slippery materials such as TPU. It incorporates dual screws on the Z-axis, ensuring stable prints, and features an integrated task light for improved visibility. With a PEI-coated build plate and a detachable touchscreen, it combines functionality and convenience. The printer also features an efficient cooling system, filament sensor and a simplified user interface. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2 / 10 | 3.2 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the TwoTrees Bluer and the Elegoo Neptune 3 Pro, each printer has its strengths and caters to different user preferences. The Bluer offers a competitive price point while providing essential features such as a manual bed leveling system and filament end sensor, making it a solid option for budget-conscious users. Its simple user interface and relatively generous print volume are beneficial for various projects. On the other hand, the Neptune 3 Pro, while slightly more expensive, is equipped with upgraded features like automatic bed leveling, a direct-drive extruder, and dual screws on the Z-axis for enhanced print stability. Its ability to handle a variety of filament types, combined with its user-friendly touchscreen and efficient cooling system, makes it a superior choice for users looking for a reliable and versatile 3D printing experience. Ultimately, the decision between the TwoTrees Bluer and the Elegoo Neptune 3 Pro hinges on the specific needs and budget of the user. If affordability and basic features are the priority, the Bluer is commendable. However, for those seeking advanced functionalities and improved performance, the Neptune 3 Pro justifies its higher cost. Both printers represent good value considering their respective features and capabilities, ultimately catering to different segments of the 3D printing market. |