Compare Bluer vs Mega S
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Bluer |
Mega S |
| Buy Filament forTwoTrees Bluer | Buy Filament forAnycubic Mega S | |
| Estimated price | $169,00 | $149,00 |
| Manufacturer | TwoTrees | Anycubic |
| Release Year | 2019 | 2019 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 230x230x280 | 210x210x205 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 400x410x520 | 405x410x452 |
| Weight [kg] | 8 | 14,5 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Manual | Manual |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Bowden |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 260 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 110 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 200 | 100 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG | PLA, TPU, ABS, PETG |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | MKS Robin Nano V1.2 + TMC2208 | 8 bits |
| Display | Touchscreen TFT 3,5'' | Touchscreen TFT 2,8'' |
| Power Supply | 240W | 12V / 300W |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | SD / USB |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2021-09-20 | 2021-04-15 |
| Release date | 2019 | 2019 |
| Extra features | The Bluer offers interesting features such as automatic bed leveling, a 3.5-inch color touchscreen for easy operation, and a filament sensor to prevent print failures. It has a robust metal extruder and a generous 230 x 230 x 280 mm print volume, suitable for a variety of projects. The community mentions improvements made by Two Trees based on feedback, increasing its reliability. | The Anycubic Mega S offers a printing platform with excellent adhesion, easy removal after cooling. It has a filament sensor for a better experience with flexible materials and a multilingual and intuitive color touchscreen. Assembly is quick, requiring only 8 screws and 3 connections. It has a large build volume (210 x 210 x 205 mm), high positioning accuracy and supports a variety of materials, including TPU, PLA, ABS and wood. It stands out for its solid metal structure, superior stability, high-quality printing with layer resolution of up to 50 microns, Ultrabase for easy adhesion and removal of parts, resumption of printing after power outage, high-quality extruder for flexible filaments, suspended filament support and stable structure that reduces shaking, improving printing quality. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2 / 10 | 2 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 0 / 10 |
Conclusion |
| ### Conclusion Both the TwoTrees Bluer and the Anycubic Mega S present compelling options in the 3D printing market, each catering to different user preferences and project requirements. The Bluer stands out with a slightly larger print volume and added features such as a more advanced touchscreen and an efficient filament end sensor, making it user-friendly for those who prioritize ease of use and reliability. Additionally, it benefits from community-driven improvements, enhancing its overall performance and stability based on user feedback. In contrast, the Anycubic Mega S shines in its robust build quality, support for a wider range of filament types, and excellent adhesion due to its Ultrabase platform. Its focus on high-quality printing and quick assembly makes it appealing for users who require precision and efficiency. When considering cost-effectiveness, while both printers offer a similar value in terms of features, the Mega S's solid metal structure and stability may justify its slightly higher price point for serious hobbyists and professionals. Ultimately, the choice between the two models may come down to specific project needs and personal preferences, but both printers provide quality and reliable performance in their respective niches. |