Compare Bluer vs Ender 3 S1 Plus
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Bluer |
Ender 3 S1 Plus[BUY Ender 3 S1 Plus] |
| Buy Filament forTwoTrees Bluer | Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 3 S1 Plus | |
| Estimated price | $169,00 | $549,00 |
| Manufacturer | TwoTrees | Creality 3D |
| Release Year | 2019 | 2022 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 230x230x280 | 300x300x300 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 400x410x520 | 557x535x655 |
| Weight [kg] | 8 | 10,25 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Manual | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 260 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 100 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 200 | 150 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG | PLA, PETG, Tritan, Flex, ABS |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | MKS Robin Nano V1.2 + TMC2208 | |
| Display | Touchscreen TFT 3,5'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
| Power Supply | 240W | 110/220V / 350W |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | SD / USB |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2021-09-20 | 2022-11-04 |
| Release date | 2019 | 2022 |
| Extra features | The Bluer offers interesting features such as automatic bed leveling, a 3.5-inch color touchscreen for easy operation, and a filament sensor to prevent print failures. It has a robust metal extruder and a generous 230 x 230 x 280 mm print volume, suitable for a variety of projects. The community mentions improvements made by Two Trees based on feedback, increasing its reliability. | The Ender 3 S1 Plus 3D Printer offers quality prints with a build volume of 300x300x300 mm. It stands out for its "Sprite" extruder, automatic bed leveling and easy-to-use touchscreen. It has excellent safety features and simple assembly. In addition, it features temperature uniformity in the heated bed, suitable for various materials. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2 / 10 | 3.2 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
| [BUY Ender 3 S1 Plus] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the TwoTrees Bluer and the Creality 3D Ender 3 S1 Plus, several key factors stand out that can influence the decision for potential buyers. The TwoTrees Bluer is significantly more budget-friendly, making it an attractive option for beginners or those looking to experiment with 3D printing without a heavy investment. It offers various practical features, including a decent print volume, a heated bed, and an automatic bed leveling system, which enhances its usability. The overall functionality, combined with an easy-to-use touchscreen interface, makes it a solid choice for individuals venturing into the world of 3D printing. Conversely, the Ender 3 S1 Plus commands a higher price but compensates with superior build volume and slightly more advanced printing technologies. Its ability to handle a broader range of materials, including specialized filaments, gives it an edge in terms of versatility. The reliability and safety features incorporated in Creality’s design also contribute to its reputation among seasoned 3D printing enthusiasts. In conclusion, the decision between the TwoTrees Bluer and the Ender 3 S1 Plus hinges on the user’s priorities. For those seeking an affordable entry point with adequate capabilities, the Bluer presents a commendable value. Conversely, if one is willing to invest more for enhanced performance, a larger print volume, and versatility in materials, the Ender 3 S1 Plus would be the better choice. Ultimately, both printers cater to different user needs, making them strong contenders in their respective categories. |