Compare Bluer vs Ender 3 PRO
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Bluer |
Ender 3 PRO[BUY Ender 3 PRO] |
| Buy Filament forTwoTrees Bluer | Buy Filament forCreality 3D Ender 3 PRO | |
| Estimated price | $169,00 | $258,00 |
| Manufacturer | TwoTrees | Creality 3D |
| Release Year | 2019 | 2019 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 230x230x280 | 220x220x250 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 400x410x520 | 440x440x465 |
| Weight [kg] | 8 | 6,62 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | NO |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Manual | Manual |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | NO |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Bowden |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 255 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 110 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 200 | 180 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG | PLA, TPU, ABS, PETG |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | MKS Robin Nano V1.2 + TMC2208 | 32 bits |
| Display | Touchscreen TFT 3,5'' | Mono |
| Power Supply | 240W | 24V / 360W Meanwell |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | SD / USB |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
| Date of registration in the system | 2021-09-20 | 2021-04-14 |
| Release date | 2019 | 2019 |
| Extra features | The Bluer offers interesting features such as automatic bed leveling, a 3.5-inch color touchscreen for easy operation, and a filament sensor to prevent print failures. It has a robust metal extruder and a generous 230 x 230 x 280 mm print volume, suitable for a variety of projects. The community mentions improvements made by Two Trees based on feedback, increasing its reliability. | The Ender 3 Pro stands out for its beginner-friendly assembly and easily modifiable structure. With a 350W power supply, it heats up quickly and has a simple application that offers good print quality. However, its motors and fans are noisy, and the interface seems outdated. Assembly is accessible, without the need for advanced techniques, and it has integrated belt tensioners. It includes a detailed guide and supports microSD card and USB. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2 / 10 | 0.5 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
| [BUY Ender 3 PRO] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the TwoTrees Bluer and the Creality 3D Ender 3 Pro, both printers showcase commendable features and value, but they cater to slightly different user needs. The TwoTrees Bluer, while being the more affordable option, offers several modern conveniences, such as a filament end sensor and power loss recovery, making it a suitable choice for less experienced users or those looking for an easy printing experience. Its generous print volume and good maximum printing speed allow it to handle a wide range of projects with potential reliability enhancements based on community feedback. The inclusion of a 3.5-inch touchscreen interface further simplifies operation. On the other hand, the Creality 3D Ender 3 Pro stands out for its solid construction and beginner-friendly assembly. It is well-known for its modifiable nature, making it a favorite among hobbyists who enjoy personalizing their machines. Despite some drawbacks, such as noise during operation and an outdated interface, its robust design and the widespread community support can be very appealing. Ultimately, the choice between the TwoTrees Bluer and the Creality 3D Ender 3 Pro depends on the user's priorities. If ease of use and modern features are paramount, the Bluer would be the recommended option. However, for users who appreciate a more hands-on approach to 3D printing with the potential for upgrades, the Ender 3 Pro may be the better fit. Both printers provide good value at their respective price points, and the decision should be guided by personal preferences and intended usage. |