Compare Bluer vs Core One
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Bluer |
Core One |
| Buy Filament forTwoTrees Bluer | Buy Filament forPrusa Core One | |
| Estimated price | $169,00 | $1200,00 |
| Manufacturer | TwoTrees | Prusa |
| Release Year | 2019 | 2025 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 230x230x280 | 250x220x270 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 400x410x520 | 385x340x620 |
| Weight [kg] | 8 | 14 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | YES |
| Bed Leveling | Manual | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 300 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 120 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 200 | 500 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG | PLA, TPU, TPE, HIPS, ABS, PETG, WOOD, PC, PA, PVA, ASA |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r | Cura, Prusa Slicer, Orca |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,01 |
| Processor | MKS Robin Nano V1.2 + TMC2208 | xBuddy 32 bit |
| Display | Touchscreen TFT 3,5'' | Touchscreen 3,5'' |
| Power Supply | 240W | 240 W |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | SD |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Linux e Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2021-09-20 | 2024-11-27 |
| Release date | 2019 | 2025 |
| Extra features | The Bluer offers interesting features such as automatic bed leveling, a 3.5-inch color touchscreen for easy operation, and a filament sensor to prevent print failures. It has a robust metal extruder and a generous 230 x 230 x 280 mm print volume, suitable for a variety of projects. The community mentions improvements made by Two Trees based on feedback, increasing its reliability. | The Prusa Core One is a CoreXY 3D printer featuring a robust steel frame, a 3.5" touchscreen, and a heated chamber for technical filaments. It offers 360° cooling for improved print quality and supports upgrades from the MK4S model. With a compact design, a print volume of 270x250x220 mm, and compatibility with the MMU3 for multi-color printing, it stands out for its ease of maintenance, precision, and speeds up to 260% faster than the MK3S+. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | YES |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Conclusion |
| In conclusion, when comparing the TwoTrees Bluer and the Prusa Core One 3D printers, it becomes clear that the choice ultimately depends on the user's priorities and budget. The TwoTrees Bluer is an economical option, offering a decent print volume and features like a filament end sensor and manual bed leveling. Its lightweight design and thermal capabilities make it suitable for beginners or hobbyists looking for straightforward 3D printing without breaking the bank. Its community-backed improvements reflect a commitment to user satisfaction, but it does come with limitations in terms of printing speed, precision, and material compatibility. On the other hand, the Prusa Core One stands out as a more advanced printer tailored for those who prioritize quality and versatility in their 3D printing projects. With features such as automatic bed leveling, a robust steel frame, and extensive filament compatibility, it provides a higher degree of reliability and performance. Additionally, its capability to support multiple colors and advanced materials positions it as a more future-proof investment for serious users or small businesses. While the Prusa Core One comes at a significantly higher price point, it delivers superior hardware, improved printing speed, and greater flexibility. As such, users should weigh their needs for speed, material support, and print quality against their budgetary constraints when choosing between these two models. Ultimately, both printers offer solid performances within their respective categories, making either a commendable choice depending on individual requirements. |