Compare Bluer vs CR M4
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
Modelo | Bluer |
CR M4 |
Buy Filament forTwoTrees Bluer | Buy Filament forCreality 3D CR M4 | |
Estimated price | $169,00 | $1099,00 |
Manufacturer | TwoTrees | Creality 3D |
Release Year | 2019 | 2023 |
Print Volume [mm] | 230x230x280 | 450x450x470 |
Printer Size [mm] | 400x410x520 | 655x700x865 |
Weight [kg] | 8 | 23 |
Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
Bed Leveling | Manual | Automatic |
Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
Bed type | Heated | Heated |
Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 300 |
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 100 |
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 200 | 180 |
Filament holder | YES | YES |
Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG | PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS, PLA-Wood, PA, PLA-CF |
Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker |
Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
Processor | MKS Robin Nano V1.2 + TMC2208 | |
Display | Touchscreen TFT 3,5'' | Display touchscreen 4,3'' |
Power Supply | 240W | 110/220V / 800W |
Connectivity | SD / USB | SD / USB / Wi-Fi |
Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Mac, Linux |
Date of registration in the system | 2021-09-20 | 2023-02-06 |
Release date | 2019 | 2023 |
Extra features | The Bluer offers interesting features such as automatic bed leveling, a 3.5-inch color touchscreen for easy operation, and a filament sensor to prevent print failures. It has a robust metal extruder and a generous 230 x 230 x 280 mm print volume, suitable for a variety of projects. The community mentions improvements made by Two Trees based on feedback, increasing its reliability. | The Creality CR-M4 printer stands out for its easy assembly and automatic table leveling. With dual-gear extruder technology and direct drive, it ensures quality prints. It offers Wi-Fi and LAN connections for easy file sending. Its large construction volume of 450x450x470 mm allows for bold projects. It has linear rails and a high-power Y motor, supporting up to 30 kg on its plate. The innovative design includes an efficient cooling system and a removable screen controller, optimizing usability and comfort during printing. |
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 6 / 10 |
Hardware | 2 / 10 | 3.6 / 10 |
Tela | . | . |
Print volume | 3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
Performance | 1 / 10 | 1 / 10 |
Conclusion |
In comparing the TwoTrees Bluer and Creality 3D CR-M4, we can derive several conclusions based on their specifications, features, and overall value. The TwoTrees Bluer, with its significantly lower price, offers a compact design and essential features suitable for casual users or beginners in 3D printing. Its smaller print volume and manual bed leveling might limit the complexity and size of the projects one can undertake. However, its filament end sensor and heated bed contribute to its functionality and reliability, making it a solid choice for those who are looking to dive into 3D printing without a substantial investment. On the other hand, the Creality 3D CR-M4, while more expensive, presents a remarkable increase in print volume and technological advancements. Its dual-gear extruder and automatic bed leveling facilitate high-quality prints, particularly for larger and more intricate projects. The addition of Wi-Fi connectivity and a more powerful power supply enhances its usability, and the advanced cooling system and removable touchscreen controller improve the overall printing experience. The CR-M4 is better suited for users who require a professional-grade printer capable of handling diverse materials and larger builds. Ultimately, the decision hinges on the user's needs. The Bluer is ideal for hobbyists seeking an economical and reliable printer for smaller projects, while the CR-M4 stands out for those willing to invest more for advanced features and greater capabilities. Both printers offer commendable performance relative to their respective price points, each catering to different user segments within the 3D printing community. |