Compare Bluer vs A1
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | Bluer |
A1[BUY A1] |
| Buy Filament forTwoTrees Bluer | Buy Filament forBambu Lab A1 | |
| Estimated price | $169,00 | $700,00 |
| Manufacturer | TwoTrees | Bambu Lab |
| Release Year | 2019 | 2023 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 230x230x280 | 256x256x256 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 400x410x520 | 385x410x430 |
| Weight [kg] | 8 | 8,3 |
| Power Loss Recovery | YES | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Manual | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | YES | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | Heated |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 260 | 300 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | 100 |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 200 | 500 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA, PETG | PLA, PETG, TPU, PVA |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r | SuperSlicer, PrusaSlicer, Cura, OrcaSlicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | MKS Robin Nano V1.2 + TMC2208 | |
| Display | Touchscreen TFT 3,5'' | Touchscreen 3,5 |
| Power Supply | 240W | 350 W |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | Wi-Fi, Bambu-Bus, Cartão Micro SD |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Linux, Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2021-09-20 | 2024-07-17 |
| Release date | 2019 | 2023 |
| Extra features | The Bluer offers interesting features such as automatic bed leveling, a 3.5-inch color touchscreen for easy operation, and a filament sensor to prevent print failures. It has a robust metal extruder and a generous 230 x 230 x 280 mm print volume, suitable for a variety of projects. The community mentions improvements made by Two Trees based on feedback, increasing its reliability. | The BambuLab A1 printer features fully automatic calibration, multi-color printing with the AMS system, active flow rate compensation, quick nozzle change with a clip, active motor noise cancellation, a build volume of 256x256x256 mm³, a maximum extruder temperature of 300°C, and a heated bed of up to 100°C. In addition, it has high precision, a machine health management system and an intuitive 3.5-inch touchscreen interface. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | YES |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 7 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 2 / 10 | 5.4 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| [BUY A1] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the TwoTrees Bluer and the Bambu Lab A1 3D printers, several key factors come into play that highlight their respective strengths and weaknesses. The TwoTrees Bluer stands out for its affordability and decent build quality, making it a great entry-level option for hobbyists. Despite its lower price point, it offers essential features such as a heated bed, manual bed leveling, and a filament end sensor. However, its maximum print speed and performance metrics are relatively modest, with limitations on the types of filaments it can use compared to its counterpart. On the other hand, the Bambu Lab A1, while significantly more expensive, delivers superior performance, advanced features, and improved automation. With fully automatic bed leveling, a higher extruder temperature, and support for multi-color and multi-material printing, it offers substantial versatility for more experienced users and professional applications. Its larger build volume and rapid printing speeds cater to users looking for efficiency and high-quality results. Ultimately, the best choice between the TwoTrees Bluer and Bambu Lab A1 heavily depends on the user's specific needs and budget. The Bluer is suitable for those just starting with 3D printing or who want a reliable machine for basic projects without breaking the bank. In contrast, the A1 is aimed at more serious enthusiasts or professionals seeking advanced capabilities and high performance, justifying its higher cost. |