Compare BIQU B1 vs Bluer

Comparison between the best 3D printers

Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.

Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.

3D Printer BIQU B1 3D Printer Bluer
Modelo

BIQU B1

Bluer

Buy Filament forBigTreeTech BIQU B1 Buy Filament forTwoTrees Bluer
Estimated price $269,00 $169,00
Manufacturer BigTreeTech TwoTrees
Release Year 2020 2019
Print Volume [mm] 235x235x270 230x230x280
Printer Size [mm] 412x402x492 400x410x520
Weight [kg] 8,00 8
Power Loss Recovery YES YES
Enclosed printer NO NO
Bed Leveling Manual Manual
Filament End Sensor YES YES
Bed type Heated Heated
Power supply system Bowden Bowden
Standard nozzle 0,4 0,4
Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] 250 260
Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] 100 100
Maximum printing speed [mm/s] 100 200
Filament holder YES YES
Camera for supervision NO NO
Recommended filaments PLA, TPU, ABS, PETG PLA, PETG
Recommended slicers Cura, Simplify, Slic3r Cura, Simplify, Slic3r
Maximum Resolution [mm] 0,1 0,1
Processor 32 Bits BTT SKR V 1.4 MKS Robin Nano V1.2 + TMC2208
Display Touchscreen TFT 3,5'' Touchscreen TFT 3,5''
Power Supply 24V / 360W 240W
Connectivity SD / USB SD / USB
Operating systems Windows, Mac, Linux Windows, Mac, Linux
Date of registration in the system 2021-04-14 2021-09-20
Release date 2020 2019
Extra features The BIQU B1 is an advanced 3D printer with a silent 32-bit BTT SKR V1.4 motherboard and ARM Cortex-M3 CPU, offering DIY interfaces (I2C, SPI, WiFi) and dual Z-axis. Its dual BTT B1 TFT35 V3.0 operating system allows real-time monitoring and multiple printing modes, including G-code visualization effects. It stands out for its BIQU SSS (Super Spring Steel), ensuring easy model adhesion and simplified removal, with the possibility of using it on both sides. It includes a filament sensor, automatically pausing printing in case of filament breakage. The multicolored RGB lights integrated into the hotend allow you to view the printing status even at night. Additional notes include the need for a BIQU-specific Type-C cable and extra interfaces for smart filament sensor and BL Touch. The Bluer offers interesting features such as automatic bed leveling, a 3.5-inch color touchscreen for easy operation, and a filament sensor to prevent print failures. It has a robust metal extruder and a generous 230 x 230 x 280 mm print volume, suitable for a variety of projects. The community mentions improvements made by Two Trees based on feedback, increasing its reliability.
Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) NO NO

Notes *

Cost-benefit 6 / 10 7 / 10
Hardware 2.4 / 10 2 / 10
Tela . .
Print volume 3 / 10 3 / 10
Performance 0 / 10 1 / 10

Conclusion

In comparing the BIQU B1 and TwoTrees Bluer 3D printers, both models offer a solid foundation for enthusiasts and hobbyists, but they cater to slightly different priorities.

The BIQU B1, released in 2020, boasts slightly larger print dimensions and a higher maximum printing speed. It features advanced hardware with a 32-bit motherboard that enhances overall performance, as well as integrated RGB lights for print monitoring—these details suggest a focus on advanced usability and tech-savvy features. Its cost-to-benefit ratio is commendable, along with several thoughtful design elements such as a dual Z-axis for improved stability and thorough firmware support.

On the other hand, the TwoTrees Bluer, although a year older, provides noteworthy functionalities like a robust metal extruder and automatic bed leveling, emphasizing user-friendliness and reliability based on community feedback. It is more affordable, making it a compelling option for those new to 3D printing or on a budget who still desire solid performance.

In conclusion, if you're seeking a slightly more sophisticated printer with advanced features and higher performance, the BIQU B1 is the better choice. However, for users prioritizing affordability and ease of use without compromising essential functionalities, the TwoTrees Bluer stands out as a highly attractive option. Ultimately, the decision may hinge not only on performance metrics but also on user preferences for complexity versus simplicity in their 3D printing experience.