Compare A8 V2 vs M5C
Comparison between the best 3D printers
Choose the best 3D printer at the best price. The cheapest 3D printers are here.
Buy a 3D printer here with 3D Fila.
 |
 |
|
| Modelo | A8 V2 |
M5C[BUY M5C] |
| Buy Filament forAnet A8 V2 | Buy Filament forAnkerMake M5C | |
| Estimated price | $129,00 | $399,00 |
| Manufacturer | Anet | AnkerMake |
| Release Year | 2021 | 2023 |
| Print Volume [mm] | 220x220x250 | 220x220x250 |
| Printer Size [mm] | 428x441x486 | 466x374x480 |
| Weight [kg] | 6,2 | 9,6 |
| Power Loss Recovery | NO | YES |
| Enclosed printer | NO | NO |
| Bed Leveling | Manual | Automatic |
| Filament End Sensor | NO | YES |
| Bed type | Heated | |
| Power supply system | Bowden | Direct Drive |
| Standard nozzle | 0,4 | 0,4 |
| Maximum Nozzle Temperature [°C] | 230 | 300 |
| Maximum Bed Temperature [°C] | 100 | |
| Maximum printing speed [mm/s] | 150 | 500 |
| Filament holder | YES | YES |
| Camera for supervision | NO | NO |
| Recommended filaments | PLA | PLA, PETG, TPU, ABS, PA, PLA-CF, PETG-CF, PA-CF |
| Recommended slicers | Cura, Simplify, Slic3r, IdeaMaker | AnkerMake Studio (macOS, Windows), Simplify3D, Ultimaker Cura, PrusaSlicer |
| Maximum Resolution [mm] | 0,1 | 0,1 |
| Processor | ||
| Display | Display touchscreen 2,8'' | |
| Power Supply | 110/220V / 250W | 350 W |
| Connectivity | SD / USB | Wi-Fi, USB-C, Bluetooth |
| Operating systems | Windows, Mac, Linux | Windows, Linux e Macbook |
| Date of registration in the system | 2022-11-10 | 2024-09-11 |
| Release date | 2021 | 2023 |
| Extra features | The Anet A8 V2 is a Cartesian-XZ type 3D printer with a build volume of 220 x 220 x 250 mm, Ender 3 design and V-slot assembly. It has a 32-bit motherboard and touchscreen interface, promising ease of use. It uses open source firmware and has thermal failure protection. It stands out for its cable organization and the absence of a heated bed, focusing on energy savings and PLA printing. It comes with an external power adapter, aiming at greater safety, especially for beginners and educational use. | The AnkerMake M5 printer stands out for its impressive print speed, reaching up to 500mm/s. It features AI print monitoring, an integrated camera for creating timelapses, auto-leveling bed with pressure sensor, direct extruder, flexible PEI-coated build plate, and Wi-Fi and USB-C connectivity. Assembly is quick and easy, and the printer is designed to deliver high print quality and ease of use. |
| Support for multiple colors and materials (AMS and CFS) | NO | NO |
Notes * |
||
| Cost-benefit | 6 / 10 | 7 / 10 |
| Hardware | 0.7 / 10 | 3.6 / 10 |
| Tela | . | . |
| Print volume | 3 / 10 | 3 / 10 |
| Performance | 1 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| [BUY M5C] |
Conclusion |
| In comparing the Anet A8 V2 and the AnkerMake M5C, several key differences determine their suitability for different user needs, particularly regarding price, features, and performance. The Anet A8 V2 is an entry-level 3D printer that offers a budget-friendly option for beginners. It has a manual bed leveling system, lacks power loss recovery, and does not include advanced features such as filament end sensors or AI monitoring. Its print speed is significantly lower, tailored mainly for PLA printing, and while it also has some basic protective features, it may not cater to more demanding projects or materials. On the other hand, the AnkerMake M5C, though higher in price, introduces numerous advanced functionalities. With features like automatic bed leveling, power loss recovery, and the ability to handle a wider range of filaments including ABS and TPU, it caters to users looking for versatility and higher productivity. It stands out with its impressive print speeds, making it ideal for projects requiring efficiency without compromising quality. In conclusion, for users who prioritize affordability and simplicity, the Anet A8 V2 provides decent functionality. However, for those willing to invest more for enhanced features, performance, and material versatility, the AnkerMake M5C is the superior choice. Ultimately, the best option depends on the user’s specific requirements, budget, and intended applications in 3D printing. |